Skip to content

BBJP vs NBJP

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

BBJPACboe

Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF

NBJPCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

BBJP −1.73pt a year

BBJP0.19%NBJP1.92%

Avg volume · 30D

BBJP 167.3×the volume

BBJP1.32MNBJP7.89K

BBJP vs NBJP Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.9%BBJP+15.2%NBJP

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BBJP +14.9%. NBJP +15.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%20%25%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BBJP 0.19%, better
NBJP 1.92%
Fund size
BBJP $18.7B
NBJP $123M
1Y total return
BBJP +14.9%
NBJP +15.2%, better
Yield (12M)
BBJP 4.71%, better
NBJP 2.06%
Holdings
BBJP 177
NBJP 57
Avg volume (30D)
BBJP 1.32M sh, better
NBJP 7.89K sh
NAV per share
BBJP $75.10
NBJP $34.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BBJP: Cost 88, Risk 41, Mission 100, Tradability 87, Holdings 59, Durability 76. NBJP: Cost 0, Risk 25, Mission 100, Tradability 33, Holdings 40, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for BBJP, NBJP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBBJPNBJP
Cost30% weightA88HigherF0
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC41HigherD25
Tradability15% weightA87HigherD33
Holdings10% weightB59HigherC40
Durability5% weightA76HigherD39

Rank among Japan funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BBJP and NBJP are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Japan⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

BBJP ranks 2nd and NBJP 17th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLJPFranklin FTSE Japan ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2ABBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AFLJHFranklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 16CHEWJiShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 17CNBJPNeuberger Berman Japan Equity ETFScore 39
  6. Rank 18FJAPNHorizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETFScore 22

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BBJPAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

NBJPCNeuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF

In short

BBJP Japan's whole board for 0.19% a year. JPMorgan's BetaBuilders fund holds roughly 170 large and mid-cap Japanese stocks and has grown into a multi-billion-dollar way to own Tokyo without paying legacy-tracker prices.

NBJP Most Japan ETFs just buy the whole market. NBJP hires stock pickers instead: a concentrated portfolio of about 60 Japanese companies screened for quality and durable growth. Active conviction, at an active price.

Stated mandate

BBJP The fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of a Japan-focused equity index.

NBJP The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.

Why people hold it

  • BBJP 0.19% a year, well under what the older iShares Japan trackers (EWJ at 0.49%, JPXN at 0.48%) charge for similar broad exposure.
  • Roughly 170 Japanese large and mid caps in one line item, tracking a Morningstar Japan index closely rather than making stock calls.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, which tends to keep the cost of getting in and out modest.
  • Running since 2018 and one of the stronger implementations in the single-country Japan group.
  • NBJP Genuinely active, not an index in disguise: roughly 60 Japanese names chosen by Neuberger Berman's research team, with at least 80% of assets in companies tied economically to Japan.aaii.com
  • Stays in its lane. A dedicated single-country Japan equity mandate, with no drift into broader Asia or global developed markets.
  • Concentration with intent: at about 60 holdings, individual picks actually move the portfolio, rather than getting diluted inside a several-hundred-stock market cap index.

Worth knowing

  • BBJP One country, one market cycle. Japan-only equity means no cushion from anywhere else when Tokyo has a bad stretch.
  • Not the cheapest ticket to Japan: Franklin's FLJP runs 0.09%, and FLJH is the currency-hedged option in the same peer set.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not quarterly, so income arrives in lumps.
  • NBJP Cost is the trade-off: a 1.92% stated expense ratio against a roughly 0.50% cohort median, with index peers like FLJP at 0.09%. Fee caps can lower the net figure, so read the current prospectus.
  • Thinly traded with a modest asset base, so spreads can run wider than the giant index Japan funds like BBJP and EWJ.
  • Young fund. It opened in 2024, so there is not yet a full market cycle to judge the stock picking against cheap index alternatives.

Full BBJP profile⁠

Full NBJP profile⁠

BBJP vs NBJP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BBJP vs NBJP Cost

Overpaying NBJP vs BBJP

$27,952

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BBJP 0.19%

    $3,952

  • NBJP 1.92%

    $31,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BBJP 0.19%
  • NBJP 1.92%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K$40K051015202530NBJP $31,904BBJP $3,952

Year by year

YearBBJPNBJPOverpaying
10$347$3,258$2,911
20$1,351$11,757$10,406
30$3,952$31,904$27,952

Expense ratio

  • 0.19%BBJP, cheaper
  • 1.92%NBJP
  • Middle half of Japan funds
  • Median 0.54%

BBJP 3rd cheapest of 18 funds

NBJP 18th cheapest of 18 funds

BBJP vs NBJP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BBJP 4.71%, better
NBJP 2.06%
Payout (12M)
BBJP $3.54
NBJP $0.70
Last payment
BBJP $3.54
NBJP $0.70
Ex-dividend
BBJP Dec 23, 2025
NBJP Dec 19, 2025
Paid on
BBJP Dec 26, 2025
NBJP Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
BBJP Annual
NBJP Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

BBJPAnnual · 8 paymentsAll BBJP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2018 $0.28; Dec 23, 2019 $1.13; Dec 22, 2020 $0.63; Dec 21, 2021 $1.59; Dec 20, 2022 $0.68; Dec 19, 2023 $1.60; Dec 24, 2024 $1.53; Dec 23, 2025 $3.54. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
NBJPIrregular · 2 paymentsAll NBJP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2024 $0.18; Dec 19, 2025 $0.70. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

BBJP vs NBJP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BBJP 12.5%NBJP 16.4%since Oct 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BBJP 1.14NBJP 0.78since Oct 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BBJP −29.1%NBJP −14.3%since Sep 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BBJP 0.82NBJP 0.70

BBJP and NBJP in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BBJPAvsFLJPA

    JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBJPCvsFLJPA

    Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.92% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BBJPAvsFLJHA

    JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBJPCvsFLJHA

    Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.92% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BBJPAvsSCJA

    JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF · iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBJPCvsSCJA

    Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF · iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.92% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.