SCJ ranks 3rd and NBJP 17th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
NBJP vs SCJ
SCJ −1.42pt a year
1.92%0.50%
SCJ 4.8×the volume
7.89K38.1K
NBJP vs SCJ Performance
+15.2%+19.8%
- NBJP 1.92%
- SCJ 0.50%, better
- NBJP $123M
- SCJ $232M
- NBJP +15.2%
- SCJ +19.8%, better
- NBJP 2.06%
- SCJ 2.77%, better
- NBJP 57
- SCJ 767
- NBJP 7.89K sh
- SCJ 38.1K sh, better
- NBJP $34.96
- SCJ $105.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NBJP | SCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | B56Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | D25 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | C40 | A85Higher |
| Durability | D39 | B63Higher |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. NBJP and SCJ are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NBJPC
SCJA
In short
NBJP Most Japan ETFs just buy the whole market. NBJP hires stock pickers instead: a concentrated portfolio of about 60 Japanese companies screened for quality and durable growth. Active conviction, at an active price.
SCJ Japan past the household-name exporters. SCJ holds roughly 800 of the country's smaller listed companies, the domestic slice that large-cap Japan benchmarks leave out, and it has been running that mandate since 2007.
Stated mandate
NBJP The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
SCJ The fund seeks to track an index composed of small-capitalization Japanese equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NBJP vs SCJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NBJP vs SCJ Cost
Overpaying NBJP vs SCJ
$21,925
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NBJP 1.92%
$31,904
SCJ 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NBJP | SCJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,258 | $900 | $2,358 |
| 20 | $11,757 | $3,460 | $8,297 |
| 30 | $31,904 | $9,979 | $21,925 |
- 1.92%NBJP
- 0.50%SCJ, cheaper
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
SCJ 9th cheapest of 18 funds
NBJP 18th cheapest of 18 funds
NBJP vs SCJ Dividends
- NBJP 2.06%
- SCJ 2.77%, better
- NBJP $0.70
- SCJ $2.92
- NBJP $0.70
- SCJ $0.92
- NBJP Dec 19, 2025
- SCJ Jun 15, 2026
- NBJP Dec 24, 2025
- SCJ Jun 18, 2026
- NBJP Irregular
- SCJ Twice a year
Distribution history
NBJP vs SCJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NBJP 16.4%SCJ 13.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- NBJP 0.78SCJ 1.08
- Worst fall
- NBJP −14.3%SCJ −28.6%
- Market sensitivity
- NBJP 0.70SCJ 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 1.92% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.92% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.92% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.