KWIN ranks 1st and BBYY 43rd of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
BBYY vs KWIN
KWIN −0.67pt a year
1.18%0.51%
KWIN 6.5×the volume
2.16K14K
BBYY vs KWIN Performance
−24.7%+2.9%
- BBYY 1.18%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- BBYY $1M
- KWIN $63M
- BBYY −30.0%
- KWIN
- BBYY 136.02%
- KWIN
- BBYY 5
- KWIN 55
- BBYY 2.16K sh
- KWIN 14K sh, better
- BBYY $8.23
- KWIN $25.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBYY | KWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | C45 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | D25 | B68Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. BBYY and KWIN are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBYYC
KWINA
In short
BBYY Most single-stock income funds write calls on the stock itself. BBYY goes a layer deeper: it sells put options on a 2x Alibaba ETF, converting leveraged volatility into premium, with upside capped and BABA's swings still in the picture.
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
Stated mandate
BBYY The fund seeks income by selling put options on leveraged ETFs tracking the 2x Long BABA Daily ETF, while also seeking capped exposure to that leveraged ETF's performance.
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBYY vs KWIN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBYY vs KWIN Cost
Overpaying BBYY vs KWIN
$11,378
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBYY 1.18%
$21,543
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBYY | KWIN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,065 | $918 | $1,147 |
| 20 | $7,697 | $3,527 | $4,170 |
| 30 | $21,543 | $10,165 | $11,378 |
- 1.18%BBYY
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
BBYY 48th cheapest of 71 funds
BBYY vs KWIN Dividends
- BBYY 136.02%
- KWIN
- BBYY $11.09
- KWIN None
- BBYY $0.06
- KWIN
- BBYY Oct 30, 2026
- KWIN
- BBYY Pays Nov 3, 2026
- KWIN
- BBYY Weekly
- KWIN
Distribution history
BBYY vs KWIN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBYY 23.0%KWIN
- Return per unit of risk
- BBYY −1.59KWIN
- Worst fall
- BBYY −33.0%KWIN
- Market sensitivity
- BBYY 0.40KWIN 0.001
Popular comparisons
- 1.18% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.