LEGR ranks 3rd and BCDF 18th of 20 funds in the Crypto Industry Stocks Category.
BCDF vs LEGR
LEGR −0.20pt a year
0.85%0.65%
LEGR 2.0×the volume
9121.87K
LEGR +5.5pt
+19.2%+24.7%
BCDF vs LEGR Performance
+11.5%+13.4%
- BCDF 0.85%
- LEGR 0.65%, better
- BCDF $25M
- LEGR $124M
- BCDF +11.5%
- LEGR +13.4%, better
- BCDF 2.25%, better
- LEGR 1.86%
- BCDF 35
- LEGR 109
- BCDF 912 sh
- LEGR 1.87K sh, better
- BCDF $33.80
- LEGR $65.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BCDF | LEGR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | B55Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A94 | A97Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | D37Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C44 | A77Higher |
Rank among Crypto Industry Stocks funds
Same Category. BCDF and LEGR are both graded against the same 20 Crypto Industry Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BCDFD
LEGRB
In short
BCDF Horizon Kinetics skips the index and picks its own blockchain names: roughly 30 companies, actively chosen, with at least 80% of assets pledged to the theme. A concentrated, opinionated take in a corner of the market built mostly on baskets.
LEGR Blockchain, hold the coins. LEGR has tracked the Indxx Blockchain Index since January 2018, owning roughly 110 global companies that build with the technology or stand to benefit from it, rather than the tokens themselves.
Stated mandate
BCDF The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital through active investment in Blockchain Development Companies. Under normal circumstances, it invests at least 80% of net assets plus investment borrowings in those companies.
LEGR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Indxx Blockchain Index before fees and expenses. The index targets companies involved with blockchain technology or positioned to benefit from its use in business processes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BCDF vs LEGR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BCDF vs LEGR Cost
Overpaying BCDF vs LEGR
$3,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BCDF 0.85%
$16,199
LEGR 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BCDF | LEGR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,163 | $345 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,440 | $1,266 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $12,717 | $3,482 |
- 0.85%BCDF
- 0.65%LEGR, cheaper
- Middle half of Crypto Industry Stocks funds
- Median 0.66%
LEGR 8th cheapest of 20 funds
BCDF 16th cheapest of 20 funds
BCDF vs LEGR Dividends
- BCDF 2.25%, better
- LEGR 1.86%
- BCDF $0.76
- LEGR $1.20
- BCDF $0.76
- LEGR $0.18
- BCDF Dec 23, 2025
- LEGR Sep 24, 2026
- BCDF Dec 24, 2025
- LEGR Sep 30, 2026
- BCDF Annual
- LEGR Quarterly
Distribution history
BCDF vs LEGR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BCDF 14.6%LEGR 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BCDF 0.98LEGR 1.59, better
- Worst fall
- BCDF −27.7%LEGR −31.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BCDF 0.76LEGR 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.