CGNG ranks 1st and BCEM 5th of 9 funds in the Emerging Markets Active Growth Category.
BCEM vs CGNG
CGNG −0.16pt a year
0.80%0.64%
CGNG 78.8×the volume
7.51K592K
BCEM vs CGNG Performance
−8.6%−7.0%
- BCEM 0.80%
- CGNG 0.64%, better
- BCEM $49M
- CGNG $3.15B
- BCEM
- CGNG +4.9%
- BCEM
- CGNG 0.65%
- BCEM 80
- CGNG 244
- BCEM 7.51K sh
- CGNG 592K sh, better
- BCEM $23.89
- CGNG $36.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BCEM | CGNG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A78Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D30 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A80Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
Same Category. BCEM and CGNG are both graded against the same 9 Emerging Markets Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BCEMC
CGNGA
In short
BCEM Baron took its 44-year growth-stock playbook into emerging markets and put it in an ETF: founder-led, capital-efficient companies of any size, run by the manager who has led Baron's EM strategy since 2011.
CGNG Most emerging-markets funds sort companies by headquarters address. CGNG sorts by where the money is made, so a developed-country firm earning heavily in developing economies can qualify. Capital Group runs it actively against the MSCI EM benchmark.
Stated mandate
BCEM The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
CGNG The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks of companies with significant exposure to developing economies or markets, including companies domiciled in developed countries when a significant share of their assets or revenues is attributable to developing countries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BCEM vs CGNG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BCEM vs CGNG Cost
Overpaying BCEM vs CGNG
$2,808
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BCEM 0.80%
$15,346
CGNG 0.64%
$12,538
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BCEM | CGNG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $1,145 | $277 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $4,375 | $1,018 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $12,538 | $2,808 |
- 0.80%BCEM
- 0.64%CGNG, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
CGNG 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
BCEM 6th cheapest of 9 funds
BCEM vs CGNG Dividends
- BCEM
- CGNG 0.65%
- BCEM None
- CGNG $0.22
- BCEM
- CGNG $0.22
- BCEM
- CGNG Dec 26, 2025
- BCEM
- CGNG Dec 29, 2025
- BCEM
- CGNG Annual
Distribution history
BCEM vs CGNG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BCEM CGNG 14.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BCEM CGNG 0.64
- Worst fall
- BCEM CGNG −15.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BCEM 1.26CGNG 0.85
BCEM and CGNG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.64% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.64% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.64% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
