CGNG ranks 1st and EMM 3rd of 9 funds in the Emerging Markets Active Growth Category.
CGNG vs EMM
CGNG −0.02pt a year
0.64%0.66%
CGNG 87.2×the volume
592K6.78K
CGNG vs EMM Performance
+4.9%+21.0%
- CGNG 0.64%, better
- EMM 0.66%
- CGNG $3.15B
- EMM $54M
- CGNG +4.9%
- EMM +21.0%, better
- CGNG 0.65%
- EMM 0.82%, better
- CGNG 244
- EMM 48
- CGNG 592K sh, better
- EMM 6.78K sh
- CGNG $36.47
- EMM $40.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGNG | EMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | B68 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | D26 |
| Durability | A80Higher | A77 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
Same Category. CGNG and EMM are both graded against the same 9 Emerging Markets Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGNGA
EMMC
In short
CGNG Most emerging-markets funds sort companies by headquarters address. CGNG sorts by where the money is made, so a developed-country firm earning heavily in developing economies can qualify. Capital Group runs it actively against the MSCI EM benchmark.
EMM Emerging markets with China cut out and no index to hide behind. Global X hands part of the stock picking to Mirae Asset's Hong Kong team, which runs a roughly 40-name book of would-be market leaders at a price below the active ex-China competition.
Stated mandate
CGNG The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks of companies with significant exposure to developing economies or markets, including companies domiciled in developed countries when a significant share of their assets or revenues is attributable to developing countries.
EMM The fund seeks long-term capital growth by actively selecting emerging-market companies outside China that may achieve or maintain dominant positions in their markets, with emphasis on early winners in growing industries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGNG vs EMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGNG vs EMM Cost
Overpaying EMM vs CGNG
$358
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGNG 0.64%
$12,538
EMM 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGNG | EMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,145 | $1,180 | $35 |
| 20 | $4,375 | $4,504 | $129 |
| 30 | $12,538 | $12,896 | $358 |
- 0.64%CGNG, cheaper
- 0.66%EMM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
CGNG 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
EMM 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
CGNG vs EMM Dividends
- CGNG 0.65%
- EMM 0.82%, better
- CGNG $0.22
- EMM $0.33
- CGNG $0.22
- EMM $0.12
- CGNG Dec 26, 2025
- EMM Jun 29, 2026
- CGNG Dec 29, 2025
- EMM Jul 7, 2026
- CGNG Annual
- EMM Twice a year
Distribution history
CGNG vs EMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGNG 14.9%EMM 19.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGNG 0.64EMM 0.81
- Worst fall
- CGNG −15.9%EMM −22.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CGNG 0.85EMM 1.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.64% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.64% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.64% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.