BDVL ranks 1st and PFOE 22nd of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.
BDVL vs PFOE
BDVL −0.20pt a year
0.39%0.59%
BDVL 11.6×the volume
236K20.4K
BDVL vs PFOE Performance
+7.7%−11.4%
- BDVL 0.39%, better
- PFOE 0.59%
- BDVL $1.77B
- PFOE $87M
- BDVL +9.7%
- PFOE
- BDVL 423
- PFOE 24
- BDVL 236K sh, better
- PFOE 20.4K sh
- BDVL $26.44
- PFOE $21.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDVL | PFOE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | B60 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | F11 |
| Tradability | B68 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C46 |
| Durability | A93Higher | C51 |
Rank among Global Active Equity funds
Same Category. BDVL and PFOE are both graded against the same 44 Global Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDVLA
PFOEC
In short
BDVL A global low-volatility fund with an active engine: a quant model picks roughly 500 stocks on low vol, quality and value, scored against MSCI's ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Fee: 0.39% net of a waiver through June 30, 2028.
PFOE Concentration is the whole idea: 15 to 30 US stocks the adviser judges high quality with long growth runways, at 0.59% a year. A late-2025 launch whose outcome rides on individual picks rather than index exposure.
Stated mandate
BDVL The Fund seeks risk-adjusted total return through active management of equity exposure, with a focus on managing volatility relative to the broad equity market.
PFOE The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed and normally invests in 15–30 equity securities of companies the Adviser considers high quality with significant long-term growth potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDVL vs PFOE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDVL vs PFOE Cost
Overpaying PFOE vs BDVL
$3,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDVL 0.39%
$7,898
PFOE 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDVL | PFOE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,058 | $353 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,051 | $1,326 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $11,635 | $3,737 |
- 0.39%BDVL, cheaper
- 0.59%PFOE
- Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
- Median 0.69%
BDVL 9th cheapest of 44 funds
PFOE 18th cheapest of 44 funds
BDVL vs PFOE Dividends
- BDVL $0.22
- PFOE $0.01
- BDVL Jun 15, 2026
- PFOE Sep 28, 2026
- BDVL Jun 18, 2026
- PFOE Sep 29, 2026
- BDVL Twice a year
- PFOE Quarterly
Distribution history
BDVL vs PFOE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDVL 8.7%PFOE
- Return per unit of risk
- BDVL 0.60PFOE
- Worst fall
- BDVL −7.7%PFOE
- Market sensitivity
- BDVL 0.61PFOE 0.78
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.