BDVL ranks 1st and SAMT 17th of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.
BDVL vs SAMT
BDVL −0.27pt a year
0.39%0.66%
BDVL 1.6×the volume
236K150K
BDVL vs SAMT Performance
+9.6%+8.8%
- BDVL 0.39%, better
- SAMT 0.66%
- BDVL $1.77B
- SAMT $794M
- BDVL +9.6%, better
- SAMT +8.8%
- BDVL
- SAMT 0.66%
- BDVL 423
- SAMT 29
- BDVL 236K sh, better
- SAMT 150K sh
- BDVL $26.44
- SAMT $41.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDVL | SAMT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | B55 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B68 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A71 |
Rank among Global Active Equity funds
Same Category. BDVL and SAMT are both graded against the same 44 Global Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDVLA
SAMTB
In short
BDVL A global low-volatility fund with an active engine: a quant model picks roughly 500 stocks on low vol, quality and value, scored against MSCI's ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Fee: 0.39% net of a waiver through June 30, 2028.
SAMT Most thematic ETFs are one-trick: one theme, forever. SAMT runs three to five macro themes at once and rotates them as the cycle turns, steered by Strategas, the macro research shop behind it. Flat 0.66%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
BDVL The Fund seeks risk-adjusted total return through active management of equity exposure, with a focus on managing volatility relative to the broad equity market.
SAMT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment principally in U.S. common stocks associated with three to five macro-thematic trends. The Adviser uses technical, fundamental, qualitative, and quantitative analysis and may adjust the portfolio as trends change.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDVL vs SAMT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDVL vs SAMT Cost
Overpaying SAMT vs BDVL
$4,998
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDVL 0.39%
$7,898
SAMT 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDVL | SAMT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,180 | $475 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,504 | $1,779 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $12,896 | $4,998 |
- 0.39%BDVL, cheaper
- 0.66%SAMT
- Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
- Median 0.69%
BDVL 9th cheapest of 44 funds
SAMT 21st cheapest of 44 funds
BDVL vs SAMT Dividends
- BDVL
- SAMT 0.66%
- BDVL
- SAMT $0.27
- BDVL $0.22
- SAMT $0.27
- BDVL Jun 15, 2026
- SAMT Dec 30, 2025
- BDVL Jun 18, 2026
- SAMT Jan 7, 2026
- BDVL Twice a year
- SAMT Annual
Distribution history
BDVL vs SAMT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDVL 8.7%SAMT 15.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BDVL 0.60SAMT 1.22
- Worst fall
- BDVL −7.7%SAMT −20.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BDVL 0.61SAMT 0.85
BDVL and SAMT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
