PANG ranks 3rd and BEC 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BEC vs PANG
BEC −0.31pt a year
0.45%0.76%
PANG 2.8×the volume
15.8K44.6K
BEC vs PANG Performance
−23.7%+7.0%
- BEC 0.45%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- BEC $1M
- PANG $9M
- BEC
- PANG +91.6%
- BEC 2
- PANG 4
- BEC 15.8K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- BEC $8.85
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BEC | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | D38 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D26 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BEC and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BECC
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BEC vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BEC vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs BEC
$5,615
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BEC 0.45%
$9,041
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BEC | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,353 | $541 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,142 | $2,014 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,656 | $5,615 |
- 0.45%BEC, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
BEC 7th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
BEC vs PANG Dividends
- BEC None
- PANG
- BEC
- PANG $1.30
- BEC
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- BEC
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- BEC
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
BEC vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BEC PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BEC PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BEC PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BEC −6.61PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.