BETH ranks 1st and BETE 3rd of 5 funds in the Crypto Derivatives Category.
BETE vs BETH
BETH −0.08pt a year
1.03%0.95%
BETE 1.4×the volume
1.72K1.2K
BETH +4.0pt
+13.8%+17.8%
BETE vs BETH Performance
−38.8%−35.0%
- BETE 1.03%
- BETH 0.95%, better
- BETE $8M
- BETH $11M
- BETE −38.8%
- BETH −35.0%, better
- BETE 31.48%, better
- BETH 21.13%
- BETE 2
- BETH 2
- BETE 1.72K sh, better
- BETH 1.2K sh
- BETE $35.80
- BETH $41.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BETE | BETH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A88Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B60Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69 | A73Higher |
Rank among Crypto Derivatives funds
Same Category. BETE and BETH are both graded against the same 5 Crypto Derivatives funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BETEB
BETHA
In short
BETE Bitcoin and ether, each exactly half the basket, held through futures rather than the coins themselves. A deliberately even-handed take on the two, for 1.03%, below the category median fee.
BETH Bitcoin or ether? BETH declines to choose. It holds both through futures inside a 1940 Act fund, weighted by market size, so the bigger coin gets the bigger slice and the mix reshuffles itself as the two trade places.
Stated mandate
BETE The Fund seeks to track the performance of an equal-weight basket of bitcoin and ether, primarily through futures contracts rather than direct holdings of either asset.
BETH BETH seeks performance corresponding to a market-capitalization-weighted basket of bitcoin and ether.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BETE vs BETH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BETE vs BETH Cost
Overpaying BETE vs BETH
$1,304
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BETE 1.03%
$19,173
BETH 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BETE | BETH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $1,678 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $6,322 | $485 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $17,869 | $1,304 |
- 1.03%BETE
- 0.95%BETH, cheaper
- Middle half of Crypto Derivatives funds
- Median 1.03%
BETH cheapest of 5 funds
BETE 2nd cheapest of 5 funds
BETE vs BETH Dividends
- BETE 31.48%, better
- BETH 21.13%
- BETE $11.27
- BETH $8.81
- BETE $0.03
- BETH $0.04
- BETE Oct 1, 2026
- BETH Oct 1, 2026
- BETE Oct 7, 2026
- BETH Oct 7, 2026
- BETE Monthly
- BETH Monthly
Distribution history
BETE vs BETH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BETE 59.8%BETH 53.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BETE 0.42BETH 0.47, better
- Worst fall
- BETE −61.4%BETH −56.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BETE 2.46BETH 2.13
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 1.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 1.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 1.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.