BETE ranks 3rd and SOLZ 4th of 5 funds in the Crypto Derivatives Category.
BETE vs SOLZ
BETE −0.61pt a year
1.03%1.64%
SOLZ 670.5×the volume
1.72K1.15M
BETE vs SOLZ Performance
−38.8%−51.4%
- BETE 1.03%, better
- SOLZ 1.64%
- BETE $8M
- SOLZ $101M
- BETE −38.8%, better
- SOLZ −51.4%
- BETE 31.48%, better
- SOLZ 2.38%
- BETE 2
- SOLZ 2
- BETE 1.72K sh
- SOLZ 1.15M sh, better
- BETE $35.80
- SOLZ $9.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BETE | SOLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74Higher | F23 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | B60 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69 | A72Higher |
Rank among Crypto Derivatives funds
Same Category. BETE and SOLZ are both graded against the same 5 Crypto Derivatives funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BETEB
SOLZD
In short
BETE Bitcoin and ether, each exactly half the basket, held through futures rather than the coins themselves. A deliberately even-handed take on the two, for 1.03%, below the category median fee.
SOLZ Solana exposure without ever touching a coin. SOLZ holds Solana futures and collateral inside a standard 1940 Act ETF: no wallet, no exchange account, no private keys. Futures pricing, not spot SOL, is what sets the ride.
Stated mandate
BETE The Fund seeks to track the performance of an equal-weight basket of bitcoin and ether, primarily through futures contracts rather than direct holdings of either asset.
SOLZ The Fund seeks daily exposure to Solana through managed investments in Solana Futures Contracts and related collateral instruments. It does not directly hold SOL.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BETE vs SOLZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BETE vs SOLZ Cost
Overpaying SOLZ vs BETE
$9,056
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BETE 1.03%
$19,173
SOLZ 1.64%
$28,229
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BETE | SOLZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $2,815 | $1,001 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $10,284 | $3,477 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $28,229 | $9,056 |
- 1.03%BETE, cheaper
- 1.64%SOLZ
- Middle half of Crypto Derivatives funds
- Median 1.03%
BETE 2nd cheapest of 5 funds
SOLZ 4th cheapest of 5 funds
BETE vs SOLZ Dividends
- BETE 31.48%, better
- SOLZ 2.38%
- BETE $11.27
- SOLZ $0.22
- BETE $0.03
- SOLZ $0.02
- BETE Oct 1, 2026
- SOLZ Oct 21, 2026
- BETE Oct 7, 2026
- SOLZ Oct 22, 2026
- BETE Monthly
- SOLZ Monthly
Distribution history
BETE vs SOLZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BETE 59.8%SOLZ 57.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BETE 0.42SOLZ −0.23
- Worst fall
- BETE −61.4%SOLZ −75.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BETE 2.46SOLZ 0.83
BETE and SOLZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.64% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 1.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.64% · 1.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 1.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.64% · 1.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
