Skip to content

BFJA vs CPRY

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January

BFJAFNYSE Arca

Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

CPRYANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CPRY −0.21pt a year

BFJA0.90%CPRY0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

CPRY 16.0×the volume

BFJA559CPRY8.92K

BFJA vs CPRY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+4.7%BFJA+1.0%CPRY

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. BFJA +4.7%. CPRY +1.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.7.5%10%12.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BFJA 0.90%
CPRY 0.69%, better
Fund size
BFJA $1M
CPRY $36M
1Y total return
BFJA No data
CPRY +8.0%
Holdings
BFJA 4
CPRY 3
Avg volume (30D)
BFJA 559 sh
CPRY 8.92K sh, better
NAV per share
BFJA $17.98
CPRY $28.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BFJA: Cost 24, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 6, Holdings 57, Durability 38. CPRY: Cost 78, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 80, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for BFJA, CPRY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBFJACPRY
Cost30% weightF24A78Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF24A81Higher
Tradability15% weightF6A80Higher
Holdings10% weightB57Not scored
Durability5% weightD38B64Higher

Rank among Other Floor Protected funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BFJA and CPRY are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Floor Protected⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

CPRY ranks 1st and BFJA 16th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPRYCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – JanuaryScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACPROCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – OctoberScore 76
  3. Rank 15FKBUFKraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2027 ETFScore 24
  4. Rank 16FBFJAFT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - JanuaryScore 20
  5. Rank 17FKPROKraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2027 ETFScore 19

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BFJAFFT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January

CPRYACalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

In short

BFJA Defined-outcome funds usually tame the stock market. BFJA points the same machinery at bitcoin: one-year outcome periods that limit participation in the reference asset's losses to 15%, in exchange for a capped upside, re-struck each January.

CPRY Small caps with a hard floor. CPRY uses options to target 100% of your starting value back over a one-year outcome period, before fees. The trade: a ceiling on the upside, reset each January.

Stated mandate

BFJA The fund seeks returns matching the price return of a reference asset designed to generally reflect bitcoin’s price, subject to a 28.06% upside cap and a maximum 15% loss exposure over January 12, 2026–January 8, 2027.

CPRY The fund seeks point-to-point exposure to the positive price return of the Russell 2000 up to a defined cap, while providing 100% downside protection over the one-year outcome period before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BFJA The floor is the whole design. Across each one-year outcome period, the fund takes at most 15% of the Bitcoin Reference Instrument's decline, before fees.
  • Bitcoin exposure arrives in an ETF wrapper tracking an index built to reflect bitcoin's price. No exchange account, no wallet, no keys to lose.
  • Terms reset every January: a fresh cap struck at then-current pricing, and the 15% floor starts over.
  • At 0.90%, the fee sits about where the defined-outcome floor group prices this kind of engineering.
  • CPRY Full protection, not a partial buffer: the design targets 100% downside protection over the one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.
  • The floor sits on small caps. The reference asset is the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM), the choppier end of US equities.
  • At 0.69%, it undercuts the 0.89% median fee among protection funds, and it sits among the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • Part of a dated series: siblings start their outcome periods in July (CPRJ) and October (CPRO), so January is not the only entry point.

Worth knowing

  • BFJA The floor is paid for with a ceiling. Upside is capped for each outcome period, and cap and floor are pre-fee figures, so the 0.90% expense ratio comes out of the result.
  • The math is built around holding from one January reset to the next. Enter or exit mid-period and you get whatever the cap and floor are worth that day.
  • Launched in 2026, it is one of the newer and less-traded names in the floor group, so spreads are worth a look. Equity-based peers CPRY (0.69%) and FLJJ (0.74%) cost less.
  • CPRY Protection is point to point and before the 0.69% fee. Buy mid-period or sell early and you get whatever the options package is worth that day.
  • Upside stops at a cap that resets with each new January outcome period. Anything the Russell 2000 gains above it stays with the index.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads can run wider than on big index ETFs.

Full BFJA profile⁠

Full CPRY profile⁠

BFJA vs CPRY Holdings

How BFJA and CPRY differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BFJA and 0.0% of CPRY.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for BFJA and CPRY.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for BFJA and CPRY.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BFJA1457.4%
  • CPRY107.7%

Securities held

  • BFJA3
  • CPRY0

Asset class

BFJA
Multi-Asset
CPRY
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BFJA3
  • In both0
  • Only in CPRY0

Only in BFJA

3 securities, 100% of BFJA by weight

  • 2027-01-08 S&P 500® Mini Index P 2,784.561447.71%
  • 2027-01-08 MBTX Index P 181.126.07%
  • 2027-01-08 MBTX Index C 245.041.17%

Only in CPRY

0 securities, 0.0% of CPRY by weight

Weight gaps

BFJA and CPRY share no securities.

All 8 BFJA holdings⁠All 5 CPRY holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BFJA vs CPRY Cost

Overpaying BFJA vs CPRY

$3,611

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BFJA 0.90%

    $17,040

  • CPRY 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BFJA 0.90%
  • CPRY 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BFJA $17,040CPRY $13,429

Year by year

YearBFJACPRYOverpaying
10$1,593$1,232$361
20$6,015$4,697$1,318
30$17,040$13,429$3,611

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%BFJA
  • 0.69%CPRY, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
  • Median 0.79%

CPRY 2nd cheapest of 18 funds

BFJA 11th cheapest of 18 funds

BFJA vs CPRY Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BFJA No data
CPRY None
Last payment
BFJA $0.54
CPRY No data
Ex-dividend
BFJA Nov 2, 2026
CPRY No data
Paid on
BFJA Pays Nov 3, 2026
CPRY No data
Frequency
BFJA Irregular
CPRY No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

BFJAIrregular · 1 paymentAll BFJA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2026 YTD. Nov 2, 2026 $0.54. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
CPRYAll CPRY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BFJA vs CPRY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BFJA No dataCPRY 2.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BFJA No dataCPRY 1.12since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BFJA No dataCPRY −3.2%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BFJA 0.36CPRY 0.15

Popular comparisons

  • BFJAFvsCPROA

    FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPRYAvsCPROA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BFJAFvsISWNA

    FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January · Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPRYAvsISWNA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January · Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BFJAFvsCPRJA

    FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – July

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPRYAvsCPRJA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – July

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.