Skip to content

BFJA vs ISWN

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January

BFJAFNYSE Arca

Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

ISWNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ISWN −0.41pt a year

BFJA0.90%ISWN0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

ISWN 3.5×the volume

BFJA559ISWN1.97K

BFJA vs ISWN Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+4.7%BFJA−2.7%ISWN

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. BFJA +4.7%. ISWN −2.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BFJA 0.90%
ISWN 0.49%, better
Fund size
BFJA $1M
ISWN $35M
1Y total return
BFJA No data
ISWN +3.7%
Yield (12M)
BFJA No data
ISWN 3.06%
Holdings
BFJA 4
ISWN 14
Avg volume (30D)
BFJA 559 sh
ISWN 1.97K sh, better
NAV per share
BFJA $17.98
ISWN $21.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BFJA: Cost 24, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 6, Holdings 57, Durability 38. ISWN: Cost 100, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 53, Durability 80.
Pillar letters and Scores for BFJA, ISWN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBFJAISWN
Cost30% weightF24A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF24D39Higher
Tradability15% weightF6B58Higher
Holdings10% weightB57HigherC53
Durability5% weightD38A80Higher

Rank among Other Floor Protected funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BFJA and ISWN are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Floor Protected⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

ISWN ranks 3rd and BFJA 16th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPRYCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – JanuaryScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACPROCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – OctoberScore 76
  3. Rank 3AISWNAmplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)Score 74
  4. Rank 4ACPRJCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – JulyScore 71
  5. Rank 15FKBUFKraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2027 ETFScore 24
  6. Rank 16FBFJAFT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - JanuaryScore 20
  7. Rank 17FKPROKraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2027 ETFScore 19

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BFJAFFT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January

ISWNAAmplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

In short

BFJA Defined-outcome funds usually tame the stock market. BFJA points the same machinery at bitcoin: one-year outcome periods that limit participation in the reference asset's losses to 15%, in exchange for a capped upside, re-struck each January.

ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.

Stated mandate

BFJA The fund seeks returns matching the price return of a reference asset designed to generally reflect bitcoin’s price, subject to a 28.06% upside cap and a maximum 15% loss exposure over January 12, 2026–January 8, 2027.

ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.

Why people hold it

  • BFJA The floor is the whole design. Across each one-year outcome period, the fund takes at most 15% of the Bitcoin Reference Instrument's decline, before fees.
  • Bitcoin exposure arrives in an ETF wrapper tracking an index built to reflect bitcoin's price. No exchange account, no wallet, no keys to lose.
  • Terms reset every January: a fresh cap struck at then-current pricing, and the 15% floor starts over.
  • At 0.90%, the fee sits about where the defined-outcome floor group prices this kind of engineering.
  • ISWN At 0.49%, it runs about half the 0.89% median of its downside-protection cohort.
  • No artificial ceiling on gains. Buffer peers like IBUF hand back everything above a set cap each outcome period; ISWN's EFA calls carry no stated cap.amplifyetfs.cominnovatoretfs.com
  • The rare international take on the structure: ISWN is the EAFE sibling of Amplify's SWAN, swapping SPY options for EFA options to reach developed markets outside the US.amplifyetfs.com
  • Rules-based, not a judgment call. It tracks the S-Network International BlackSwan Index, which sets the Treasury and option mix on a fixed schedule.amplifyetfs.com

Worth knowing

  • BFJA The floor is paid for with a ceiling. Upside is capped for each outcome period, and cap and floor are pre-fee figures, so the 0.90% expense ratio comes out of the result.
  • The math is built around holding from one January reset to the next. Enter or exit mid-period and you get whatever the cap and floor are worth that day.
  • Launched in 2026, it is one of the newer and less-traded names in the floor group, so spreads are worth a look. Equity-based peers CPRY (0.69%) and FLJJ (0.74%) cost less.
  • ISWN The Treasury sleeve targets the duration of the 10-year note, so interest rates steer results as much as EAFE does.amplifyetfs.com
  • The cushion is indirect. It leans on Treasuries holding up when stocks fall, not a contractual buffer, so no fixed percentage of downside is defined.amplifyetfs.com
  • Among the smaller and more thinly traded funds in its category, which can widen bid-ask spreads on entry and exit.

Full BFJA profile⁠

Full ISWN profile⁠

BFJA vs ISWN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BFJA vs ISWN Cost

Overpaying BFJA vs ISWN

$7,248

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BFJA 0.90%

    $17,040

  • ISWN 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BFJA 0.90%
  • ISWN 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BFJA $17,040ISWN $9,792

Year by year

YearBFJAISWNOverpaying
10$1,593$883$710
20$6,015$3,394$2,621
30$17,040$9,792$7,248

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%BFJA
  • 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
  • Median 0.79%

ISWN cheapest of 18 funds

BFJA 11th cheapest of 18 funds

BFJA vs ISWN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
BFJA No data
ISWN 3.06%
Payout (12M)
BFJA No data
ISWN $0.65
Last payment
BFJA $0.54
ISWN $0.17
Ex-dividend
BFJA Nov 2, 2026
ISWN Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
BFJA Pays Nov 3, 2026
ISWN Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
BFJA Irregular
ISWN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

BFJAIrregular · 1 paymentAll BFJA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Nov 2, 2026 $0.54. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ISWNQuarterly · 23 paymentsAll ISWN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Mar 29, 2021 $0.0067; Jun 28, 2021 $0.02; Sep 28, 2021 $0.03; Dec 29, 2021 $0.13; Mar 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 28, 2022 $0.07; Sep 28, 2022 $0.12; Dec 28, 2022 $0.13; Mar 29, 2023 $0.14; Jun 28, 2023 $0.14; Sep 27, 2023 $0.14; Dec 27, 2023 $0.14; Mar 26, 2024 $0.14; Jun 27, 2024 $0.14; Sep 27, 2024 $0.15; Dec 30, 2024 $0.15; Mar 28, 2025 $0.16; Jun 27, 2025 $0.15; Sep 29, 2025 $0.15; Dec 30, 2025 $0.16; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.16; Sep 29, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

BFJA vs ISWN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BFJA No dataISWN 12.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BFJA No dataISWN 0.54
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BFJA No dataISWN −31.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BFJA 0.36ISWN 0.58

Popular comparisons

  • BFJAFvsCPRYA

    FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ISWNAvsCPRYA

    Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International) · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BFJAFvsCPROA

    FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ISWNAvsCPROA

    Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International) · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BFJAFvsCPRJA

    FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – July

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ISWNAvsCPRJA

    Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International) · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – July

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.