ISWN ranks 3rd and BFJA 16th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
BFJA vs ISWN
ISWN −0.41pt a year
0.90%0.49%
ISWN 3.5×the volume
5591.97K
BFJA vs ISWN Performance
+4.7%−2.7%
- BFJA 0.90%
- ISWN 0.49%, better
- BFJA $1M
- ISWN $35M
- BFJA
- ISWN +3.7%
- BFJA
- ISWN 3.06%
- BFJA 4
- ISWN 14
- BFJA 559 sh
- ISWN 1.97K sh, better
- BFJA $17.98
- ISWN $21.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BFJA | ISWN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | D39Higher |
| Tradability | F6 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | B57Higher | C53 |
| Durability | D38 | A80Higher |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. BFJA and ISWN are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BFJAF
ISWNA
In short
BFJA Defined-outcome funds usually tame the stock market. BFJA points the same machinery at bitcoin: one-year outcome periods that limit participation in the reference asset's losses to 15%, in exchange for a capped upside, re-struck each January.
ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.
Stated mandate
BFJA The fund seeks returns matching the price return of a reference asset designed to generally reflect bitcoin’s price, subject to a 28.06% upside cap and a maximum 15% loss exposure over January 12, 2026–January 8, 2027.
ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BFJA vs ISWN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BFJA vs ISWN Cost
Overpaying BFJA vs ISWN
$7,248
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BFJA 0.90%
$17,040
ISWN 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BFJA | ISWN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $883 | $710 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $3,394 | $2,621 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $9,792 | $7,248 |
- 0.90%BFJA
- 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
ISWN cheapest of 18 funds
BFJA 11th cheapest of 18 funds
BFJA vs ISWN Dividends
- BFJA
- ISWN 3.06%
- BFJA
- ISWN $0.65
- BFJA $0.54
- ISWN $0.17
- BFJA Nov 2, 2026
- ISWN Sep 29, 2026
- BFJA Pays Nov 3, 2026
- ISWN Sep 30, 2026
- BFJA Irregular
- ISWN Quarterly
Distribution history
BFJA vs ISWN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BFJA ISWN 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BFJA ISWN 0.54
- Worst fall
- BFJA ISWN −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BFJA 0.36ISWN 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.