CPRO ranks 2nd and BFJL 13th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
BFJL vs CPRO
CPRO −0.21pt a year
0.90%0.69%
CPRO 13.0×the volume
3875.02K
BFJL vs CPRO Performance
−5.8%+7.4%
- BFJL 0.90%
- CPRO 0.69%, better
- BFJL $4M
- CPRO $27M
- BFJL −5.8%
- CPRO +7.4%, better
- BFJL 5
- CPRO 3
- BFJL 387 sh
- CPRO 5.02K sh, better
- BFJL $18.81
- CPRO $28.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BFJL | CPRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A88 | |
| Risk | D29 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | C48 | B65Higher |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. BFJL and CPRO are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BFJLD
CPROA
In short
BFJL Bitcoin with a seatbelt. BFJL follows the price return of a bitcoin reference instrument, absorbs the first 15% of a decline over a one-year outcome period, and gives up gains above a cap that resets each July.
CPRO Small-cap exposure without small-cap drawdowns: CPRO tracks the Russell 2000 and aims to shield 100% of capital across each one-year outcome period, trading away upside above a preset cap.
Stated mandate
BFJL The Fund seeks to match the price return of a bitcoin-linked reference asset, subject to a 27.82% upside cap, while limiting its maximum loss from reference-instrument losses to 15% over the July 1, 2026–July 9, 2027 Target Outcome Period.
CPRO The ETF seeks to provide Russell 2000 exposure with defined upside participation while protecting 100% of capital from losses over the one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BFJL vs CPRO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BFJL vs CPRO Cost
Overpaying BFJL vs CPRO
$3,611
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BFJL 0.90%
$17,040
CPRO 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BFJL | CPRO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $1,232 | $361 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $4,697 | $1,318 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $13,429 | $3,611 |
- 0.90%BFJL
- 0.69%CPRO, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
CPRO 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BFJL 11th cheapest of 18 funds
BFJL vs CPRO Dividends
- BFJL
- CPRO None
- BFJL $0.24
- CPRO
- BFJL Dec 29, 2025
- CPRO
- BFJL Dec 31, 2025
- CPRO
- BFJL Irregular
- CPRO
Distribution history
BFJL vs CPRO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BFJL 12.9%CPRO 3.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BFJL −0.73CPRO 0.94
- Worst fall
- BFJL −21.2%CPRO −3.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BFJL 0.18CPRO 0.21
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.