XTJA ranks 4th and BFXU 10th of 12 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated Category.
BFXU vs XTJA
0.0%by weight
XTJA −0.16pt a year
0.95%0.79%
XTJA 7.6×the volume
3562.7K
BFXU vs XTJA Performance
+0.7%+2.6%
- BFXU 0.95%
- XTJA 0.79%, better
- BFXU $2M
- XTJA $17M
- BFXU
- XTJA +13.4%
- BFXU 5
- XTJA 3
- BFXU 356 sh
- XTJA 2.7K sh, better
- BFXU $23.29
- XTJA $35.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BFXU | XTJA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | B63Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | C41 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | A70 | |
| Durability | F23 | C53Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated funds
Same Category. BFXU and XTJA are both graded against the same 12 S&P 500 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
BFXU vs XTJA Holdings
How BFXU and XTJA differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BFXU and 0.0% of XTJA.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BFXU.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BFXUMore in XTJA | BFXU | XTJA |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | BFXU +0.5 points | 100.0% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | XTJA +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| China | XTJA +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | XTJA +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BFXU100.0%
- XTJA120.1%
- BFXU4
- XTJA3
Asset class
- BFXU
- Multi-Asset
- XTJA
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BFXU4
- In both0
- Only in XTJA3
Only in BFXU
4 securities, 99.9% of BFXU by weight
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July25.04%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April24.98%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October24.96%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January24.87%
Only in XTJA
3 securities, 100% of XTJA by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 6.78 C98.44%
- Spy 12/31/2026 681.88 C21.54%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.13%
Weight gaps
BFXU and XTJA share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BFXU vs XTJA Cost
Overpaying BFXU vs XTJA
$2,695
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BFXU 0.95%
$17,869
XTJA 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BFXU | XTJA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,405 | $273 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $5,331 | $991 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $15,174 | $2,695 |
- 0.95%BFXU
- 0.79%XTJA, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated funds
- Median 0.79%
XTJA 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
BFXU 12th cheapest of 12 funds
BFXU vs XTJA Dividends
- BFXU None
- XTJA None
Distribution history
BFXU vs XTJA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BFXU XTJA 8.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BFXU XTJA 1.26
- Worst fall
- BFXU XTJA −26.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BFXU 1.15XTJA 0.57
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.