CGXU ranks 1st and BGCG 13th of 14 funds in the International Active Growth Category.
BGCG vs CGXU
CGXU −0.18pt a year
0.72%0.54%
CGXU 67.7×the volume
14.8K1M
BGCG vs CGXU Performance
−1.8%−6.2%
- BGCG 0.72%
- CGXU 0.54%, better
- BGCG $101M
- CGXU $6.59B
- BGCG
- CGXU +7.8%
- BGCG
- CGXU 5.37%
- BGCG 30
- CGXU 86
- BGCG 14.8K sh
- CGXU 1M sh, better
- BGCG $26.49
- CGXU $31.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGCG | CGXU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F1 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | B57 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | F21 | B64Higher |
| Durability | D39 | A90Higher |
Rank among International Active Growth funds
Same Category. BGCG and CGXU are both graded against the same 14 International Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGCGD
CGXUB
In short
BGCG Baillie Gifford's most concentrated international book, in an ETF shell: roughly 30 transformational growth names held for years, not quarters. The Edinburgh firm's mutual fund reorganized into it in 2026, so the strategy has a past even if the ticker doesn't.
CGXU Launched in 2022, CGXU runs international growth on a short leash: roughly 80 developed- and emerging-market stocks picked bottom-up, at a fee below the typical active rival in its lane.
Stated mandate
BGCG The fund seeks capital appreciation through active management of an international portfolio of common stocks and other equity securities issued in developed and emerging markets.
CGXU The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing primarily in international equities, including companies in developed and emerging markets. It uses active, bottom-up stock selection to pursue companies with attractive growth opportunities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGCG vs CGXU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGCG vs CGXU Cost
Overpaying BGCG vs CGXU
$3,237
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGCG 0.72%
$13,957
CGXU 0.54%
$10,720
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGCG | CGXU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,284 | $971 | $313 |
| 20 | $4,888 | $3,724 | $1,164 |
| 30 | $13,957 | $10,720 | $3,237 |
- 0.72%BGCG
- 0.54%CGXU, cheaper
- Middle half of International Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
CGXU 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
BGCG 14th cheapest of 14 funds
BGCG vs CGXU Dividends
- BGCG
- CGXU 5.37%
- BGCG None
- CGXU $1.69
- BGCG
- CGXU $0.41
- BGCG
- CGXU Jun 30, 2026
- BGCG
- CGXU Jul 1, 2026
- BGCG
- CGXU Twice a year
Distribution history
BGCG vs CGXU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGCG CGXU 15.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BGCG CGXU 0.84
- Worst fall
- BGCG CGXU −25.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BGCG 1.05CGXU 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.72% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.