Skip to content
etf.net

BGCG vs JIG

BAILLIE GIFFORD INTERNATIONAL CONCENTRATED GROWTH ETF

BGCGDNasdaq

JPMorgan International Growth ETF

JIGBNYSE Arca

Overlap

11.4%by weight

Expense ratio

JIG −0.17pt a year

BGCG0.72%JIG0.55%

Avg volume · 30D

JIG 2.2×the volume

BGCG14.8KJIG32K

BGCG vs JIG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.8%BGCG−2.1%JIG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BGCG −1.8%. JIG −2.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%4%6%8%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BGCG 0.72%
JIG 0.55%, better
Fund size
BGCG $101M
JIG $526M
1Y total return
BGCG No data
JIG +6.3%
Yield (12M)
BGCG No data
JIG 2.07%
Holdings
BGCG 30
JIG 92
Avg volume (30D)
BGCG 14.8K sh
JIG 32K sh, better
NAV per share
BGCG $26.49
JIG $79.41
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BGCG: Cost 1, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings 21, Durability 39. JIG: Cost 50, Risk 58, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 51, Durability 94.
Pillar letters and Scores for BGCG, JIG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBGCGJIG
Cost30% weightF1C50Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB63HigherB58
Tradability15% weightB57B65Higher
Holdings10% weightF21C51Higher
Durability5% weightD39A94Higher

Rank among International Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BGCG and JIG are both graded against the same 14 International Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Active Growth⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

JIG ranks 3rd and BGCG 13th of 14 funds in the International Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1BCGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BFFGXFidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 3BJIGJPMorgan International Growth ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BMTRAInvesco International Growth Focus ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 11DVNIEVontobel International Equity Active ETFScore 32
  6. Rank 13DBGCGBAILLIE GIFFORD INTERNATIONAL CONCENTRATED GROWTH ETFScore 30
  7. PJINNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BGCGDBAILLIE GIFFORD INTERNATIONAL CONCENTRATED GROWTH ETF

JIGBJPMorgan International Growth ETF

In short

BGCG Baillie Gifford's most concentrated international book, in an ETF shell: roughly 30 transformational growth names held for years, not quarters. The Edinburgh firm's mutual fund reorganized into it in 2026, so the strategy has a past even if the ticker doesn't.

JIG J.P. Morgan's stockpickers loose on international growth: roughly 90 foreign companies chosen one at a time, priced under the typical active peer in this corner of the market.

Stated mandate

BGCG The fund seeks capital appreciation through active management of an international portfolio of common stocks and other equity securities issued in developed and emerging markets.

JIG The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in foreign equity securities.

Why people hold it

  • BGCG Concentrated on purpose: the issuer calls this its most concentrated international strategy, 20 to 35 transformational growth businesses chosen through bottom-up research.bailliegifford.com
  • Built to sit still. The prospectus says it aims to hold securities for long periods, typically at least five years, which generally keeps portfolio turnover low.sec.gov
  • Not a brand-new idea in a new wrapper: the Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities mutual fund reorganized into this ETF on June 1, 2026.sec.gov
  • Developed and emerging markets in one active mandate, with the full holdings list published daily so you can see what you own.bailliegifford.com
  • JIG At 0.55%, it undercuts the median fee among active international growth peers and lands within a basis point of the cohort's cheapest name, CGXU (0.54%).
  • Roughly 90 foreign companies. Concentrated enough that individual picks show up in results, without the thousand-name sprawl of a broad index.
  • Sits in the upper tier of its active international growth peer group on our review.
  • Live since 2020, so there is a multi-year real-money record behind the strategy rather than a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • BGCG Conviction costs: 0.72% a year sits above the roughly 0.55% median for its peer group, where CGXU charges 0.54% and JIG 0.55%.
  • Non-diversified by design. The prospectus flags significant exposure to a single country or a few countries, and a large share of assets in few issuers or sectors.sec.gov
  • "International" comes with an asterisk: the fund may invest up to 20% of net assets in companies located in the US.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • JIG Thinly traded next to big index funds, so spreads and order size matter more here than with a heavily traded ETF.
  • No index to grade it against. The mandate is long-term capital appreciation from foreign equities, and the route there is the manager's call.jpmorgan.com
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly or quarterly.

Full BGCG profile⁠

Full JIG profile⁠

BGCG vs JIG Holdings

How BGCG and JIG differ

Overlap by weight

11.4%

Shared holdings make up 30.9% of BGCG and 11.4% of JIG.

Level by level

  • Holdings4 in both11.4%
  • Countryby domicile51.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for BGCG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BGCG and JIG, widest gap first
CountryMore in BGCGMore in JIG
United StatesBGCG +21.4 points
JapanJIG +13.0 points
BrazilBGCG +9.4 points
United KingdomJIG +8.3 points
South KoreaJIG +6.4 points
ChinaBGCG +6.3 points
NetherlandsBGCG +4.8 points
SpainJIG +3.1 points
Other countries (18)JIG +11.1 points

Outside the US: BGCG 50% developed, 50% emerging. JIG 69% developed, 31% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BGCG62.8%
  • JIG29.4%

Securities held

  • BGCG28
  • JIG85

Asset class

BGCG
Equity
JIG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BGCG24
  • In both4
  • Only in JIG81

Only in BGCG

24 securities, 69.1% of BGCG by weight

  • Mercadolibre Inc USD 0.0017.94%
  • NVIDIA Corp USD 0.0015.66%
  • Shopify Inc Npv5.06%

Only in JIG

81 securities, 88.3% of JIG by weight

  • JPMorgan Prime Money3.70%
  • Safran SA Common Stock2.43%
  • Shopify Inc Common Stock2.41%

Weight gaps

All 4 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BGCG and JIG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BGCGMore in JIG
Taiwan Semiconductor Manuf Twd 10.0BGCG +8.02 points
Spotify Technology SA Eur 0.000625SPOTBGCG +7.02 points
Asml Holding NV Eur 0.09BGCG +2.78 points
Contemporary Amperex Techno Cny 1.0BGCG +1.64 points

All 28 BGCG holdings⁠All 86 JIG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BGCG vs JIG Cost

Overpaying BGCG vs JIG

$3,053

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BGCG 0.72%

    $13,957

  • JIG 0.55%

    $10,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BGCG 0.72%
  • JIG 0.55%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BGCG $13,957JIG $10,904

Year by year

YearBGCGJIGOverpaying
10$1,284$988$296
20$4,888$3,790$1,098
30$13,957$10,904$3,053

Expense ratio

  • 0.72%BGCG
  • 0.55%JIG, cheaper
  • Middle half of International Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JIG 6th cheapest of 14 funds

BGCG 14th cheapest of 14 funds

BGCG vs JIG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BGCG No data
JIG 2.07%
Payout (12M)
BGCG None
JIG $1.65
Last payment
BGCG No data
JIG $1.65
Ex-dividend
BGCG No data
JIG Dec 16, 2025
Paid on
BGCG No data
JIG Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
BGCG No data
JIG Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

BGCGAll BGCG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JIGAnnual · 7 paymentsAll JIG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2020 $0.03; Dec 15, 2021 $0.54; Dec 21, 2021 $0.49; Dec 20, 2022 $0.48; Dec 19, 2023 $0.98; Dec 24, 2024 $1.06; Dec 16, 2025 $1.65. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD

BGCG vs JIG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BGCG No dataJIG 14.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BGCG No dataJIG 0.88
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BGCG No dataJIG −42.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BGCG 1.05JIG 0.98

BGCG and JIG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • BGCGDvsCGXUB

    BAILLIE GIFFORD INTERNATIONAL CONCENTRATED GROWTH ETF · Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JIGBvsCGXUB

    JPMorgan International Growth ETF · Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BGCGDvsFFGXB

    BAILLIE GIFFORD INTERNATIONAL CONCENTRATED GROWTH ETF · Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JIGBvsFFGXB

    JPMorgan International Growth ETF · Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BGCGDvsMTRAB

    BAILLIE GIFFORD INTERNATIONAL CONCENTRATED GROWTH ETF · Invesco International Growth Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JIGBvsMTRAB

    JPMorgan International Growth ETF · Invesco International Growth Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.