Skip to content
etf.net

BGDV vs SWP

Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

BGDVBNYSE Arca

SWP Growth & Income ETF

SWPFNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

BGDV −0.54pt a year

BGDV0.45%SWP0.99%

Avg volume · 30D

BGDV 4.0×the volume

BGDV32.2KSWP8.14K

BGDV vs SWP Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+18.9%BGDV+6.8%SWP

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BGDV +18.9%. SWP +6.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BGDV 0.45%, better
SWP 0.99%
Fund size
BGDV $878M
SWP $145M
1Y total return
BGDV +18.9%, better
SWP +6.8%
Yield (12M)
BGDV 0.94%
SWP 9.57%, better
Holdings
BGDV 47
SWP 43
Avg volume (30D)
BGDV 32.2K sh, better
SWP 8.14K sh
NAV per share
BGDV $31.51
SWP $27.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BGDV: Cost 73, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 64, Durability 70. SWP: Cost 0, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 58, Durability 51.
Pillar letters and Scores for BGDV, SWP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBGDVSWP
Cost30% weightA73HigherF0
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC44HigherF18
Tradability15% weightA81HigherC46
Holdings10% weightB64HigherB58
Durability5% weightA70HigherC51

Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BGDV and SWP are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Dividend Income⁠

Category · 40 funds
See all 40 ›

BGDV ranks 4th and SWP 37th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ACGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AHIDVAB US High Dividend ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3ABGIGBahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BBGDVBahl & Gaynor Dividend ETFScore 67
  5. Rank 4BFDIVMarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 37FKDVDKeeley Dividend ETFScore 23
  7. Rank 37FSWPSWP Growth & Income ETFScore 23
  8. DIVHNot yet graded
  9. HQDGNot yet graded

BGDV vs SWP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BGDV vs SWP Cost

Overpaying SWP vs BGDV

$9,484

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BGDV 0.45%

    $9,041

  • SWP 0.99%

    $18,525

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BGDV 0.45%
  • SWP 0.99%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530SWP $18,525BGDV $9,041

Year by year

YearBGDVSWPOverpaying
10$812$1,746$934
20$3,128$6,565$3,437
30$9,041$18,525$9,484

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%BGDV, cheaper
  • 0.99%SWP
  • Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
  • Median 0.50%

BGDV 9th cheapest of 40 funds

SWP 40th cheapest of 40 funds

BGDV vs SWP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BGDV 0.94%
SWP 9.57%, better
Payout (12M)
BGDV $0.29
SWP $2.62
Last payment
BGDV $0.02
SWP $0.57
Ex-dividend
BGDV Oct 29, 2026
SWP Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
BGDV Pays Nov 2, 2026
SWP Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
BGDV Monthly
SWP Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

BGDVMonthly · 23 paymentsAll BGDV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2024 $0.02; Jan 30, 2025 $0.01; Feb 27, 2025 $0.01; Mar 28, 2025 $0.05; Apr 29, 2025 $0.02; May 29, 2025 $0.02; Jun 27, 2025 $0.04; Jul 30, 2025 $0.02; Aug 28, 2025 $0.02; Sep 29, 2025 $0.04; Oct 30, 2025 $0.02; Nov 26, 2025 $0.02; Dec 31, 2025 $0.04; Jan 29, 2026 $0.0066; Feb 26, 2026 $0.02; Mar 26, 2026 $0.05; Apr 29, 2026 $0.01; May 28, 2026 $0.02; Jun 29, 2026 $0.02; Jul 30, 2026 $0.02; Aug 28, 2026 $0.02; Sep 29, 2026 $0.02; Oct 29, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
SWPQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll SWP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2024 $0.11; Mar 28, 2025 $0.22; Jun 27, 2025 $0.15; Sep 29, 2025 $0.40; Dec 30, 2025 $0.80; Mar 30, 2026 $0.63; Jun 29, 2026 $0.62; Sep 29, 2026 $0.57. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

BGDV vs SWP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BGDV 11.4%since Jan 2025SWP 11.9%since Oct 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BGDV 1.00since Jan 2025SWP 0.59since Oct 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BGDV −14.8%since Dec 2024SWP −16.4%since Sep 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BGDV 0.69SWP 0.96

BGDV and SWP in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • BGDVBvsCGDVA

    Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SWPFvsCGDVA

    SWP Growth & Income ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BGDVBvsHIDVA

    Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SWPFvsHIDVA

    SWP Growth & Income ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BGDVBvsBGIGA

    Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SWPFvsBGIGA

    SWP Growth & Income ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.