CGXU ranks 1st and BGIA 5th of 14 funds in the International Active Growth Category.
BGIA vs CGXU
CGXU −0.05pt a year
0.59%0.54%
CGXU 8.6×the volume
116K1M
BGIA vs CGXU Performance
−2.2%−6.2%
- BGIA 0.59%
- CGXU 0.54%, better
- BGIA $320M
- CGXU $6.59B
- BGIA
- CGXU +7.8%
- BGIA
- CGXU 5.37%
- BGIA 86
- CGXU 86
- BGIA 116K sh
- CGXU 1M sh, better
- BGIA $24.50
- CGXU $31.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGIA | CGXU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | B67Higher | B64 |
| Durability | B61 | A90Higher |
Rank among International Active Growth funds
Same Category. BGIA and CGXU are both graded against the same 14 International Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGIAB
CGXUB
In short
BGIA Baillie Gifford's long-horizon growth style, in an ETF. Roughly 80 international companies picked stock by stock with no eye on the benchmark: the diversified cousin of the firm's famously concentrated portfolios.
CGXU Launched in 2022, CGXU runs international growth on a short leash: roughly 80 developed- and emerging-market stocks picked bottom-up, at a fee below the typical active rival in its lane.
Stated mandate
BGIA The fund applies a diversified international growth strategy, selecting a concentrated portfolio through bottom-up research and active stock picking.
CGXU The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing primarily in international equities, including companies in developed and emerging markets. It uses active, bottom-up stock selection to pursue companies with attractive growth opportunities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGIA vs CGXU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGIA vs CGXU Cost
Overpaying BGIA vs CGXU
$915
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGIA 0.59%
$11,635
CGXU 0.54%
$10,720
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGIA | CGXU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $971 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $3,724 | $327 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $10,720 | $915 |
- 0.59%BGIA
- 0.54%CGXU, cheaper
- Middle half of International Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
CGXU 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
BGIA 10th cheapest of 14 funds
BGIA vs CGXU Dividends
- BGIA
- CGXU 5.37%
- BGIA None
- CGXU $1.69
- BGIA
- CGXU $0.41
- BGIA
- CGXU Jun 30, 2026
- BGIA
- CGXU Jul 1, 2026
- BGIA
- CGXU Twice a year
Distribution history
BGIA vs CGXU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGIA CGXU 15.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BGIA CGXU 0.84
- Worst fall
- BGIA CGXU −25.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BGIA 1.36CGXU 0.96
BGIA and CGXU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
