BGIG ranks 3rd and ELCV 15th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
BGIG vs ELCV
BGIG −0.04pt a year
0.45%0.49%
BGIG 3.0×the volume
171K56K
BGIG vs ELCV Performance
+18.6%+22.4%
- BGIG 0.45%, better
- ELCV 0.49%
- BGIG $2.29B
- ELCV $291M
- BGIG +18.6%
- ELCV +22.4%, better
- BGIG 1.67%
- ELCV 2.10%, better
- BGIG 50
- ELCV 50
- BGIG 171K sh, better
- ELCV 56K sh
- BGIG $37.45
- ELCV $31.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGIG | ELCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73Higher | B55 |
| Mission | C40 | A88Higher |
| Risk | B64Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B68 |
| Holdings | C53Higher | C50 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B69 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. BGIG and ELCV are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGIGA
ELCVC
In short
BGIG An active dividend fund that writes the cushion into its own mandate: rising income, downside protection versus the broad market, and growth. Distributions land monthly, and it charges less than the typical active dividend-income fund.
ELCV A 2024 newcomer in a field full of veterans: an actively managed high-dividend portfolio that undercuts the typical active dividend ETF on fees and pays shareholders quarterly.
Stated mandate
BGIG The Fund seeks growing dividend income, downside protection relative to the broader equity market, and long-term capital appreciation.
ELCV The Fund seeks income, income growth, and long-term capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in dividend-paying securities using a long-only, actively managed, fundamental and values-based approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGIG vs ELCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGIG vs ELCV Cost
Overpaying ELCV vs BGIG
$751
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGIG 0.45%
$9,041
ELCV 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGIG | ELCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $883 | $71 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $3,394 | $266 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $9,792 | $751 |
- 0.45%BGIG, cheaper
- 0.49%ELCV
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
BGIG 9th cheapest of 40 funds
ELCV 15th cheapest of 40 funds
BGIG vs ELCV Dividends
- BGIG 1.67%
- ELCV 2.10%, better
- BGIG $0.62
- ELCV $0.67
- BGIG $0.05
- ELCV $0.12
- BGIG Oct 29, 2026
- ELCV Sep 29, 2026
- BGIG Pays Nov 2, 2026
- ELCV Sep 30, 2026
- BGIG Monthly
- ELCV Quarterly
Distribution history
BGIG vs ELCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGIG 9.5%ELCV 13.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BGIG 1.49ELCV 0.76
- Worst fall
- BGIG −13.2%ELCV −18.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BGIG 0.55ELCV 0.69
BGIG and ELCV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

