BGIG ranks 3rd and FDV 9th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
BGIG vs FDV
BGIG −0.05pt a year
0.45%0.50%
FDV 1.01×the volume
171K173K
FDV +1.3pt
+18.4%+19.7%
BGIG vs FDV Performance
+18.5%+27.5%
- BGIG 0.45%, better
- FDV 0.50%
- BGIG $2.28B
- FDV $1.03B
- BGIG +18.5%
- FDV +27.5%, better
- BGIG 1.67%
- FDV 2.81%, better
- BGIG 50
- FDV 54
- BGIG 171K sh
- FDV 173K sh, better
- BGIG $37.18
- FDV $34.36
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGIG | FDV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73Higher | B55 |
| Mission | C40 | B58Higher |
| Risk | B65 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B68 |
| Holdings | C53 | A71Higher |
| Durability | A83 | A83 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. BGIG and FDV are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGIGA
FDVB
In short
BGIG An active dividend fund that writes the cushion into its own mandate: rising income, downside protection versus the broad market, and growth. Distributions land monthly, and it charges less than the typical active dividend-income fund.
FDV A dividend playbook Federated Hermes has run in mutual fund form since 2005, now wrapped in an ETF: about 50 high-dividend U.S. stocks screened for dividend growth, paying monthly. 0.50% net of a waiver through January 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
BGIG The Fund seeks growing dividend income, downside protection relative to the broader equity market, and long-term capital appreciation.
FDV The fund seeks income and long-term capital appreciation through primarily investing in high dividend-paying common stocks of U.S. issuers with potential for dividend growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGIG vs FDV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGIG vs FDV Cost
Overpaying FDV vs BGIG
$938
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGIG 0.45%
$9,041
FDV 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGIG | FDV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $900 | $88 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $3,460 | $332 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $9,979 | $938 |
- 0.45%BGIG, cheaper
- 0.50%FDV
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
BGIG 9th cheapest of 40 funds
FDV 17th cheapest of 40 funds
BGIG vs FDV Dividends
- BGIG 1.67%
- FDV 2.81%, better
- BGIG $0.62
- FDV $0.98
- BGIG $0.05
- FDV $0.08
- BGIG Oct 29, 2026
- FDV Oct 30, 2026
- BGIG Nov 2, 2026
- FDV Nov 2, 2026
- BGIG Monthly
- FDV Monthly
Distribution history
BGIG vs FDV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGIG 9.5%, betterFDV 12.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BGIG 1.49, betterFDV 1.17
- Worst fall
- BGIG −13.2%FDV −16.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BGIG 0.55FDV 0.51
BGIG and FDV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
