BGIG ranks 3rd and GEND 13th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
BGIG vs GEND
GEND −0.07pt a year
0.45%0.38%
BGIG 85.5×the volume
171K2K
BGIG vs GEND Performance
+18.6%+27.4%
- BGIG 0.45%
- GEND 0.38%, better
- BGIG $2.29B
- GEND $6M
- BGIG +18.6%
- GEND +27.4%, better
- BGIG 1.67%
- GEND 2.82%, better
- BGIG 50
- GEND 34
- BGIG 171K sh, better
- GEND 2K sh
- BGIG $37.45
- GEND $13.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGIG | GEND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73 | A87Higher |
| Mission | C40 | |
| Risk | B64 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | F6 |
| Holdings | C53Higher | C48 |
| Durability | A83Higher | D37 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. BGIG and GEND are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGIGA
GENDB
In short
BGIG An active dividend fund that writes the cushion into its own mandate: rising income, downside protection versus the broad market, and growth. Distributions land monthly, and it charges less than the typical active dividend-income fund.
GEND A boutique manager's swing at dividend investing: hand-picked US payers at 0.38%, priced under most active funds in the category. It launched at the end of 2024, so it is still one of the small, lightly traded names on the shelf.
Stated mandate
BGIG The Fund seeks growing dividend income, downside protection relative to the broader equity market, and long-term capital appreciation.
GEND The Fund seeks current income and long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGIG vs GEND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGIG vs GEND Cost
Overpaying BGIG vs GEND
$1,335
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGIG 0.45%
$9,041
GEND 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGIG | GEND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $688 | $124 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $2,658 | $470 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $7,706 | $1,335 |
- 0.45%BGIG
- 0.38%GEND, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
GEND 6th cheapest of 40 funds
BGIG 9th cheapest of 40 funds
BGIG vs GEND Dividends
- BGIG 1.67%
- GEND 2.82%, better
- BGIG $0.62
- GEND $0.39
- BGIG $0.05
- GEND $0.11
- BGIG Oct 29, 2026
- GEND Sep 29, 2026
- BGIG Pays Nov 2, 2026
- GEND Sep 30, 2026
- BGIG Monthly
- GEND Quarterly
Distribution history
BGIG vs GEND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGIG 9.5%GEND 12.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BGIG 1.49GEND 1.27
- Worst fall
- BGIG −13.2%GEND −13.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BGIG 0.55GEND 0.38
BGIG and GEND in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

