BGIG ranks 3rd and KDVD 37th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
BGIG vs KDVD
BGIG −0.45pt a year
0.45%0.90%
BGIG 556.7×the volume
171K307
BGIG vs KDVD Performance
+16.4%+19.9%
- BGIG 0.45%, better
- KDVD 0.90%
- BGIG $2.28B
- KDVD $9M
- BGIG +18.5%
- KDVD
- BGIG 1.67%
- KDVD
- BGIG 50
- KDVD 72
- BGIG 171K sh, better
- KDVD 307 sh
- BGIG $37.18
- KDVD $29.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGIG | KDVD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73Higher | F3 |
| Mission | C40 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | C53 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | D31 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. BGIG and KDVD are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGIGA
KDVDF
In short
BGIG An active dividend fund that writes the cushion into its own mandate: rising income, downside protection versus the broad market, and growth. Distributions land monthly, and it charges less than the typical active dividend-income fund.
KDVD Most dividend funds fish the same large-cap pond. Keeley's active take heads down the cap ladder, hunting dividend payers among small and mid-sized companies, with at least 80% of assets in stocks that pay (or are expected to pay) one.
Stated mandate
BGIG The Fund seeks growing dividend income, downside protection relative to the broader equity market, and long-term capital appreciation.
KDVD Actively managed ETF seeking capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of companies that pay (or are expected to pay) dividends; the Fund expects to invest primarily in small- and mid-cap companies but may invest in any market capitalization.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGIG vs KDVD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGIG vs KDVD Cost
Overpaying KDVD vs BGIG
$7,999
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGIG 0.45%
$9,041
KDVD 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGIG | KDVD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,593 | $781 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $6,015 | $2,887 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $17,040 | $7,999 |
- 0.45%BGIG, cheaper
- 0.90%KDVD
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
BGIG 9th cheapest of 40 funds
KDVD 39th cheapest of 40 funds
BGIG vs KDVD Dividends
- BGIG 1.67%
- KDVD
- BGIG $0.62
- KDVD
- BGIG $0.05
- KDVD $0.17
- BGIG Oct 29, 2026
- KDVD Sep 28, 2026
- BGIG Nov 2, 2026
- KDVD Oct 8, 2026
- BGIG Monthly
- KDVD Quarterly
Distribution history
BGIG vs KDVD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGIG 9.5%KDVD
- Return per unit of risk
- BGIG 1.49KDVD
- Worst fall
- BGIG −13.2%KDVD
- Market sensitivity
- BGIG 0.55KDVD 0.59
BGIG and KDVD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
