CGDV ranks 1st and KDVD 37th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
CGDV vs KDVD
CGDV −0.57pt a year
0.33%0.90%
CGDV 11071.4×the volume
3.4M307
CGDV vs KDVD Performance
+12.5%+19.9%
- CGDV 0.33%, better
- KDVD 0.90%
- CGDV $38.9B
- KDVD $9M
- CGDV +15.6%
- KDVD
- CGDV 1.24%
- KDVD
- CGDV 57
- KDVD 72
- CGDV 3.4M sh, better
- KDVD 307 sh
- CGDV $48.81
- KDVD $29.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGDV | KDVD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | F3 |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | C46Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | C47 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | D31 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. CGDV and KDVD are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGDVA
KDVDF
In short
CGDV A stock picker's dividend fund at near-index pricing: 0.33% a year, roughly 60 names, and a mandate for above-average yield plus growth. Live since 2022 and already grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund.
KDVD Most dividend funds fish the same large-cap pond. Keeley's active take heads down the cap ladder, hunting dividend payers among small and mid-sized companies, with at least 80% of assets in stocks that pay (or are expected to pay) one.
Stated mandate
CGDV The fund seeks income above the average yield of U.S. stocks while also offering capital-growth potential.
KDVD Actively managed ETF seeking capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of companies that pay (or are expected to pay) dividends; the Fund expects to invest primarily in small- and mid-cap companies but may invest in any market capitalization.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGDV vs KDVD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGDV vs KDVD Cost
Overpaying KDVD vs CGDV
$10,303
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGDV 0.33%
$6,737
KDVD 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGDV | KDVD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $1,593 | $995 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $6,015 | $3,697 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $17,040 | $10,303 |
- 0.33%CGDV, cheaper
- 0.90%KDVD
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
CGDV 2nd cheapest of 40 funds
KDVD 39th cheapest of 40 funds
CGDV vs KDVD Dividends
- CGDV 1.24%
- KDVD
- CGDV $0.60
- KDVD
- CGDV $0.15
- KDVD $0.17
- CGDV Sep 30, 2026
- KDVD Sep 28, 2026
- CGDV Oct 1, 2026
- KDVD Oct 8, 2026
- CGDV Quarterly
- KDVD Quarterly
Distribution history
CGDV vs KDVD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGDV 11.9%KDVD
- Return per unit of risk
- CGDV 1.59KDVD
- Worst fall
- CGDV −21.8%KDVD
- Market sensitivity
- CGDV 0.90KDVD 0.59
CGDV and KDVD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
