BIDD vs IDVZ: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

iShares International Dividend Active ETF

BIDDBNYSE Arca

Polen International Dividend Income ETF

IDVZCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

BIDD −0.15pt a year

BIDD0.60%IDVZ0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

BIDD 1.5×the volume

BIDD36.1KIDVZ24K

BIDD vs IDVZ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.2%BIDD+13.2%IDVZ

Expense ratio: BIDD 0.60%, better; IDVZ 0.75%
Fund size: BIDD $367M; IDVZ $202M
1Y total return: BIDD +9.2%; IDVZ +13.2%, better
Yield (12M): BIDD 8.11%, better; IDVZ 2.98%
Holdings: BIDD 59; IDVZ 41
Avg volume (30D): BIDD 36.1K sh, better; IDVZ 24K sh
NAV per share: BIDD $28.84; IDVZ $33.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for BIDD, IDVZ, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	BIDD	IDVZ
Cost30% weight	B61Higher	D35
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	D33	B60Higher
Tradability15% weight	B64	A72Higher
Holdings10% weight	C51Higher	C50
Durability5% weight	A83Higher	C46

Rank among International Active Dividend Income funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. BIDD and IDVZ are both graded against the same 7 International Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Active Dividend Income⁠

Category · 7 funds

See all 7 ›

BIDD ranks 4th and IDVZ 5th of 7 funds in the International Active Dividend Income Category.

Rank 1BVDIVirtus International Dividend ETFScore 67
Rank 2BJHIDJohn Hancock International High Dividend ETFScore 66
Rank 3BIDVOAmplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETFScore 59
Rank 4BBIDDiShares International Dividend Active ETFScore 55
Rank 5CIDVZPolen International Dividend Income ETFScore 50
Rank 6DADIVGuinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETFScore 33

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BIDDBiShares International Dividend Active ETF

IDVZCPolen International Dividend Income ETF

In short

BIDD BlackRock lifted a 1997-vintage international dividend strategy out of its mutual fund shell and dropped it into an ETF. What you get: roughly 50 hand-picked non-US dividend payers, an active manager, and a fee under the peer-group median.

IDVZ No data

Stated mandate

BIDD The fund uses active fundamental research to invest in high-quality companies outside the U.S. that pay attractive and growing dividends, providing international equity exposure with an income focus.

IDVZ No data

Why people hold it

BIDD 0.60% a year sits below the median for active international dividend funds, and well under pricier rivals in the group such as JHID (2.17%) and ADVE (0.79%).
Not a startup strategy in a new coat: the predecessor mutual fund, running since 1997, rolled its assets into this ETF in a November 2024 reorganization.sec.gov
Fundamental research picks quality companies outside the US that pay attractive and growing dividends, and the fund distributes quarterly.ishares.com
Lands in the upper half of a small field of active international dividend funds, with a multi-billion-dollar issuer's operational muscle behind it.

IDVZ No data

Worth knowing

BIDD Stock picking, not index tracking: about 50 names measured against the MSCI ACWI ex USA benchmark, so the portfolio can drift a long way from it in either direction.
Thinly traded next to index-tracking international funds, so bid-ask spreads and order type matter more at the moment you trade.
The exchange-traded history starts with the late-2024 conversion, so ETF-level trading and risk data is short even though the strategy itself is old.sec.gov

IDVZ No data

Full BIDD profile⁠

Full IDVZ profile⁠

BIDD vs IDVZ Holdings

How BIDD and IDVZ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BIDD and 0.0% of IDVZ.

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%
Countryby domicile46.6%
Sector10 Sectors66.8%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in BIDD and IDVZ, widest gap first
Sector	More in BIDDMore in IDVZ	BIDD	IDVZ
Consumer Staples	IDVZ +21.7 points	1.0%	22.7%
Technology	BIDD +10.4 points	19.7%	9.3%
Consumer Discretionary	BIDD +10.3 points	10.3%	0.0%
Industrials	BIDD +6.7 points	13.4%	6.7%
Health Care	IDVZ +6.3 points	6.2%	12.5%
Materials	BIDD +5.7 points	8.7%	3.0%
Communication	IDVZ +3.6 points	6.6%	10.2%
Financials	IDVZ +0.8 points	19.5%	20.3%
Energy	IDVZ +0.7 points	9.2%	9.9%
Utilities	BIDD +0.2 points	5.6%	5.4%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BIDD and IDVZ, widest gap first
Country	More in BIDDMore in IDVZ	BIDD	IDVZ
United Kingdom	IDVZ +15.6 points	14.0%	29.6%
Japan	BIDD +14.1 points	19.8%	5.7%
Germany	BIDD +10.7 points	10.7%	0.0%
Brazil	IDVZ +8.6 points	0.0%	8.6%
South Korea	BIDD +8.2 points	8.2%	0.0%
Mexico	IDVZ +6.9 points	1.7%	8.6%
Italy	IDVZ +6.5 points	0.0%	6.5%
Switzerland	IDVZ +6.1 points	0.0%	6.0%
Other countries (15)	BIDD +10.7 points	45.7%	35.0%

Outside the US: BIDD 76% developed, 24% emerging. IDVZ 71% developed, 29% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

BIDD36.9%
IDVZ35.5%

Securities held

BIDD52
IDVZ41

Asset class

BIDD: Equity
IDVZ: Equity

Holdings

Only in BIDD52
In both0
Only in IDVZ41

Only in BIDD

52 securities, 96.7% of BIDD by weight

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing4.93%
Shell4.79%
Totalenergies4.38%
Vinci SA3.99%
Suzuki Motor3.50%
Linde PLC3.50%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria3.47%
Rwe AG2.90%
Samsung Electronics Ltd2.59%
Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Group2.58%
Osaka Gas2.53%
Sk Hynix2.49%
Otp Bank2.48%
Evolution Mining2.44%
Samsung Electronics Non Voting Pre2.31%
Dbs Group Holdings Ltd2.25%
Deutsche Boerse AG2.03%
Novo Nordisk Class B1.98%
Compass Group PLC1.88%
Industria De Diseno Textil SA1.81%
Deutsche Telekom N AG1.77%
Hoya1.76%
Advantest1.72%
Netease Adr1.72%
Allianz1.68%
Siemens Energy N AG1.64%
Keyence1.61%
Mercadolibre1.60%
Airtel Africa PLC1.53%
Grupo Mexico B1.53%
Astrazeneca PLC1.46%
Hitachi1.44%
Tencent Holdings1.44%
Grab Holdings Class A1.27%
Natwest Group PLC1.22%
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd1.19%
Sony Group1.12%
Sanofi SA1.10%
Schneider Electric1.06%
Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero)0.99%
Asm International NV0.98%
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize0.95%
Tokyo Electron0.93%
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC0.90%
Nu Holdings Class A0.89%
Rio Tinto0.88%
Nec0.84%
Prysmian0.83%
Recruit Holdings Ltd0.68%
Contemporary Amperex Technology A0.56%

Only in IDVZ

41 securities, 100% of IDVZ by weight

Petroleo Brasileiro SA4.14%
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC4.03%
Roche Holding AG3.67%
Imperial Brands PLC3.58%
TotalEnergies SE3.54%
Enel SpA3.53%
AstraZeneca PLC3.38%
British American Tobacco PLC3.27%
Sanofi3.26%
Gsk PLC3.15%
Bunzl PLC2.89%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd ADR2.89%
Bp PLC2.81%
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA2.79%
Rio Tinto PLC2.52%
Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV2.49%
America Movil SAB de CV2.40%
China Construction Bank Corp2.37%
Nestle SA2.35%
ASML Holding NV2.35%
BNP Paribas SA2.32%
Orange SA2.28%
BB Seguridade Participacoes SA2.24%
Tokio Marine Holdings Inc2.23%
Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV2.20%
Koninklijke KPN NV2.18%
Canadian National Railway Co2.08%
HSBC Holdings PLC2.03%
Telefonica Brasil SA2.02%
Iberdrola SA2.00%
ICICI Bank Ltd1.92%
Copa Holdings SA1.87%
Unilever PLC1.84%
Hitachi Ltd1.77%
State Street Inst U.s. Government Mmkt Admn Class1.76%
Tokyo Electron Ltd1.55%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro1.48%
International Container Termin1.46%
Bank Rakyat Indonesia Persero1.27%
Lenovo Group Ltd1.09%
Nokia Oyj1.00%

Weight gaps

BIDD and IDVZ share no securities.

All 52 BIDD holdings⁠All 41 IDVZ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BIDD vs IDVZ Cost

Overpaying IDVZ vs BIDD

$2,665

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

BIDD 0.60%
$11,817
IDVZ 0.75%
$14,482

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

BIDD 0.60%
IDVZ 0.75%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	BIDD	IDVZ	Overpaying
10	$1,076	$1,336	$260
20	$4,116	$5,078	$962
30	$11,817	$14,482	$2,665

Expense ratio

0.60%BIDD, cheaper
0.75%IDVZ

BIDD0.60%IDVZ0.75%

0.39%0.79%

Middle half of International Active Dividend Income funds
Median 0.65%

BIDD 3rd cheapest of 7 funds

IDVZ 5th cheapest of 7 funds

BIDD vs IDVZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): BIDD 8.11%, better; IDVZ 2.98%
Payout (12M): BIDD $2.33; IDVZ $1.00
Last payment: BIDD $0.08; IDVZ $0.07
Ex-dividend: BIDD Sep 15, 2026; IDVZ Sep 29, 2026
Paid on: BIDD Sep 18, 2026; IDVZ Sep 30, 2026
Frequency: BIDD Quarterly; IDVZ Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

BIDDQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll BIDD payments⁠

IDVZMonthly · 20 paymentsAll IDVZ payments⁠

BIDD vs IDVZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: BIDD 13.0%since Dec 2024IDVZ 10.6%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: BIDD 0.61since Dec 2024IDVZ 1.57since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: BIDD −15.1%since Nov 2024IDVZ −11.0%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: BIDD 0.87IDVZ 0.15; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

BIDDBvsVDIB
iShares International Dividend Active ETF · Virtus International Dividend ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.39%
Category
IDVZCvsVDIB
Polen International Dividend Income ETF · Virtus International Dividend ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.39%
Category
BIDDBvsJHIDB
iShares International Dividend Active ETF · John Hancock International High Dividend ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.46%
Category
IDVZCvsJHIDB
Polen International Dividend Income ETF · John Hancock International High Dividend ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.46%
Category
BIDDBvsIDVOB
iShares International Dividend Active ETF · Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.65%
Category
IDVZCvsIDVOB
Polen International Dividend Income ETF · Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.65%
Category