UNHG ranks 2nd and BIDG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BIDG vs UNHG
8.3%by weight
BIDG −0.02pt a year
0.75%0.77%
UNHG 6.6×the volume
110K726K
BIDG vs UNHG Performance
−74.2%+22.2%
- BIDG 0.75%, better
- UNHG 0.77%
- BIDG $5M
- UNHG $63M
- BIDG
- UNHG +11.9%
- BIDG 4
- UNHG 5
- BIDG 110K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- BIDG $4.59
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BIDG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | B60 |
| Mission | A90 | |
| Risk | C45 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C48 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BIDG and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BIDGC
UNHGA
In short
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BIDG vs UNHG Holdings
How BIDG and UNHG differ
8.3%
Shared holdings make up 12.0% of UNHG and 8.3% of BIDG.
Level by level
- Holdings8.3%
Sector
No Sector split for BIDG and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BIDGMore in UNHG | BIDG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- BIDG208.3%
- UNHG212.0%
- BIDG1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- BIDG
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BIDG0
- In both1
- Only in UNHG0
Only in BIDG
0 securities, 0.0% of BIDG by weight
Only in UNHG
0 securities, 0.0% of UNHG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in BIDGMore in UNHG | BIDG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | UNHG +3.65 points | 8.34% | 11.99% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BIDG vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying UNHG vs BIDG
$347
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BIDG 0.75%
$14,482
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BIDG | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,371 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,205 | $127 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,829 | $347 |
- 0.75%BIDG, cheaper
- 0.77%UNHG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
BIDG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
BIDG vs UNHG Dividends
- BIDG None
- UNHG
- BIDG
- UNHG $1.90
- BIDG
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- BIDG
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- BIDG
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
BIDG vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BIDG UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BIDG UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BIDG UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BIDG 3.67UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.