TSMG ranks 1st and BIDG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BIDG vs TSMG
8.3%by weight
BIDG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
BIDG 1.6×the volume
110K69K
BIDG vs TSMG Performance
−74.2%+41.5%
- BIDG 0.75%, better
- TSMG 0.76%
- BIDG $5M
- TSMG $28M
- BIDG
- TSMG +40.8%
- BIDG 4
- TSMG 5
- BIDG 110K sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- BIDG $4.59
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BIDG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | C45 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C48 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BIDG and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BIDGC
TSMGA
In short
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BIDG vs TSMG Holdings
How BIDG and TSMG differ
8.3%
Shared holdings make up 12.4% of TSMG and 8.3% of BIDG.
Level by level
- Holdings8.3%
Sector
No Sector split for BIDG and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BIDGMore in TSMG | BIDG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- BIDG208.3%
- TSMG212.4%
- BIDG1
- TSMG1
Asset class
- BIDG
- Equity
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BIDG0
- In both1
- Only in TSMG0
Only in BIDG
0 securities, 0.0% of BIDG by weight
Only in TSMG
0 securities, 0.0% of TSMG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in BIDGMore in TSMG | BIDG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | TSMG +4.07 points | 8.34% | 12.41% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BIDG vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying TSMG vs BIDG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BIDG 0.75%
$14,482
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BIDG | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%BIDG, cheaper
- 0.76%TSMG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
BIDG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
BIDG vs TSMG Dividends
- BIDG None
- TSMG
- BIDG
- TSMG $2.73
- BIDG
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- BIDG
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- BIDG
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
BIDG vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BIDG TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BIDG TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- BIDG TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BIDG 3.67TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.