BNDW ranks 2nd and BINC 8th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BINC vs BNDW
BNDW −0.35pt a year
0.40%0.05%
BINC 18.7×the volume
2.19M117K
BINC +1.7pt
+6.2%+4.5%
BINC vs BNDW Performance
+1.1%−0.2%
- BINC 0.40%
- BNDW 0.05%, better
- BINC $16.9B
- BNDW $1.9B
- BINC +1.1%, better
- BNDW −0.2%
- BINC 6.49%, better
- BNDW 4.68%
- BINC 4354
- BNDW 4
- BINC 2.19M sh, better
- BNDW 117K sh
- BINC $50.69
- BNDW $66.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BINC | BNDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A80 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B69Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | F20 |
| Durability | A80 | A83Higher |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BINC and BNDW are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BINCB
BNDWA
In short
BINC The anti-Agg. BINC's prospectus caps plain-vanilla Treasuries, agency MBS and US investment grade corporates at 20% of assets, turning a BlackRock credit team loose on global income. 0.40% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
BNDW One ticker for the whole investment-grade bond market, home and abroad. Vanguard built BNDW as a wrapper around its own US and international bond funds and prices the package at 0.05% a year.
Stated mandate
BINC The fund seeks to maximize long-term income by primarily investing in debt and other income-producing securities.
BNDW The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index and provide broad exposure to the global investment-grade bond market through an ETF-of-ETFs structure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BINC vs BNDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BINC vs BNDW Cost
Overpaying BINC vs BNDW
$7,030
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BINC 0.40%
$8,090
BNDW 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BINC | BNDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $92 | $631 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $360 | $2,433 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,060 | $7,030 |
- 0.40%BINC
- 0.05%BNDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
BNDW cheapest of 28 funds
BINC 14th cheapest of 28 funds
BINC vs BNDW Dividends
- BINC 6.49%, better
- BNDW 4.68%
- BINC $3.28
- BNDW $3.12
- BINC $0.23
- BNDW $0.21
- BINC Nov 2, 2026
- BNDW Nov 2, 2026
- BINC Pays Nov 5, 2026
- BNDW Pays Nov 4, 2026
- BINC Monthly
- BNDW Monthly
Distribution history
BINC vs BNDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BINC 3.5%, betterBNDW 4.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BINC 0.54, betterBNDW 0.10
- Worst fall
- BINC −2.7%BNDW −16.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BINC 0.52BNDW 0.82
BINC and BNDW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

