GRNB ranks 2nd and BINC 8th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BINC vs GRNB
GRNB −0.20pt a year
0.40%0.20%
BINC 64.0×the volume
2.19M34.2K
BINC +0.9pt
+6.2%+5.3%
BINC vs GRNB Performance
+1.1%+0.2%
- BINC 0.40%
- GRNB 0.20%, better
- BINC $16.9B
- GRNB $196M
- BINC +1.1%, better
- GRNB +0.2%
- BINC 6.49%, better
- GRNB 4.94%
- BINC 4354
- GRNB 473
- BINC 2.19M sh, better
- GRNB 34.2K sh
- BINC $50.69
- GRNB $23.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BINC | GRNB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A80 | A93Higher |
| Risk | B69Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A72 | A100Higher |
| Durability | A80Higher | C48 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BINC and GRNB are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BINCB
GRNBA
In short
BINC The anti-Agg. BINC's prospectus caps plain-vanilla Treasuries, agency MBS and US investment grade corporates at 20% of assets, turning a BlackRock credit team loose on global income. 0.40% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
GRNB Its peer group is stacked with total-bond-market giants. GRNB goes narrow instead: only dollar-denominated green bonds funding environmental projects, issued worldwide by governments, supranationals and companies. A 2017-vintage specialist at 0.20%.
Stated mandate
BINC The fund seeks to maximize long-term income by primarily investing in debt and other income-producing securities.
GRNB The fund seeks to track the S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index before fees and expenses. The index covers U.S.-dollar-denominated green bonds financing environmentally friendly projects and issued globally by supranational, government, and corporate entities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BINC vs GRNB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BINC vs GRNB Cost
Overpaying BINC vs GRNB
$3,935
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BINC 0.40%
$8,090
GRNB 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BINC | GRNB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $365 | $358 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $1,421 | $1,372 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $4,155 | $3,935 |
- 0.40%BINC
- 0.20%GRNB, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
GRNB 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
BINC 14th cheapest of 28 funds
BINC vs GRNB Dividends
- BINC 6.49%, better
- GRNB 4.94%
- BINC $3.28
- GRNB $1.16
- BINC $0.23
- GRNB $0.10
- BINC Nov 2, 2026
- GRNB Nov 2, 2026
- BINC Pays Nov 5, 2026
- GRNB Pays Nov 5, 2026
- BINC Monthly
- GRNB Monthly
Distribution history
BINC vs GRNB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BINC 3.5%, betterGRNB 4.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BINC 0.54, betterGRNB 0.30
- Worst fall
- BINC −2.7%GRNB −16.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BINC 0.52GRNB 0.69
BINC and GRNB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
