QQQD ranks 21st and BIS 49th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
BIS vs QQQD
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
QQQD 7.8×the volume
8.68K68.1K
BIS vs QQQD Performance
−49.7%−0.7%
- BIS 0.95%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- BIS $2M
- QQQD $28M
- BIS −49.7%
- QQQD −0.7%, better
- BIS 5.90%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- BIS 1
- QQQD 3
- BIS 8.68K sh
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- BIS $10.47
- QQQD $12.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BIS | QQQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F22 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | C43Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D39Higher | D38 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. BIS and QQQD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BISD
QQQDC
In short
BIS The only -2x bet against biotech: BIS aims to deliver twice the inverse of the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index's daily move, then resets the clock every night. A gentler dial than the -3x biotech bear funds, and designed for single-day exposure.
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
BIS The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to approximately negative two times the daily performance of the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index. It is not designed to achieve that target over periods longer than one day.
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BIS vs QQQD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BIS vs QQQD Cost
Overpaying BIS vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BIS 0.95%
$17,869
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BIS | QQQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%BIS
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
BIS 6th cheapest of 53 funds
BIS vs QQQD Dividends
- BIS 5.90%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- BIS $0.62
- QQQD $0.41
- BIS $0.14
- QQQD $0.10
- BIS Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- BIS Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- BIS Quarterly
- QQQD Quarterly
Distribution history
BIS vs QQQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BIS 31.5%QQQD 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BIS −1.52QQQD −1.14
- Worst fall
- BIS −83.2%QQQD −51.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BIS −1.17QQQD −1.35
BIS and QQQD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
