YCS ranks 5th and QQQD 21st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs YCS
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
QQQD 2.9×the volume
68.1K23.3K
QQQD vs YCS Performance
−0.7%+11.7%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- YCS 0.95%
- QQQD $28M
- YCS $27M
- QQQD −0.7%
- YCS +11.7%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- YCS
- QQQD 3
- YCS 1
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- YCS 23.3K sh
- QQQD $12.18
- YCS $54.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | YCS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67 | A88Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | B59Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and YCS are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
YCSB
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
YCS A 2008-vintage ProShares fund built for one job: expressing a bearish yen view at twice the daily move, in a brokerage account, without an FX platform or margin desk. Currency trading, ticker-sized.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
YCS YCS seeks daily results corresponding to -2 times the daily performance of the Japanese yen relative to the U.S. dollar, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs YCS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs YCS Cost
Overpaying YCS vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
YCS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | YCS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%YCS
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
YCS 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs YCS Dividends
- QQQD 3.35%
- YCS
- QQQD $0.41
- YCS None
- QQQD $0.10
- YCS
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- YCS
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- YCS
- QQQD Quarterly
- YCS
Distribution history
QQQD vs YCS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%YCS 20.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14YCS 0.42
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%YCS −27.3%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.35YCS −0.39
QQQD and YCS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
