BITA ranks 1st and LFGY 12th of 21 funds in the Crypto Option Income Category.
BITA vs LFGY
BITA −0.37pt a year
0.65%1.02%
LFGY 1.5×the volume
27.8K42.7K
BITA vs LFGY Performance
+11.9%−14.6%
- BITA 0.65%, better
- LFGY 1.02%
- BITA $94M
- LFGY $59M
- BITA
- LFGY −23.2%
- BITA
- LFGY 81.23%
- BITA 4
- LFGY 51
- BITA 27.8K sh
- LFGY 42.7K sh, better
- BITA $56.65
- LFGY $14.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BITA | LFGY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A97Higher | B69 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | B62Higher | B55 |
Rank among Crypto Option Income funds
Same Category. BITA and LFGY are both graded against the same 21 Crypto Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BITAA
LFGYC
In short
BITA BlackRock's take on the bitcoin income trade: own actual bitcoin, then sell calls on only a quarter to a third of it. Most crypto covered-call funds hand over the upside to buy the yield. This one is built to leave most of it on the table.
LFGY YieldMax made its name on single-stock option income. LFGY is the spread-out version: an actively managed basket of crypto-industry and tech stocks with options written against them, paying out monthly.
Stated mandate
BITA The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of bitcoin while generating premium income through an actively managed strategy of selling call options primarily on IBIT shares and, from time to time, on ETP indices.
LFGY The actively managed fund seeks current income and capital appreciation through a portfolio of U.S.-listed equity securities issued by crypto-industry and technology companies, while using options on those securities and related ETFs to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BITA vs LFGY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BITA vs LFGY Cost
Overpaying LFGY vs BITA
$6,295
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BITA 0.65%
$12,717
LFGY 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BITA | LFGY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,797 | $634 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $6,746 | $2,306 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $19,012 | $6,295 |
- 0.65%BITA, cheaper
- 1.02%LFGY
- Middle half of Crypto Option Income funds
- Median 0.85%
BITA cheapest of 21 funds
LFGY 17th cheapest of 21 funds
BITA vs LFGY Dividends
- BITA
- LFGY 81.23%
- BITA
- LFGY $12.02
- BITA $0.92
- LFGY $0.11
- BITA Nov 3, 2026
- LFGY Nov 4, 2026
- BITA Nov 6, 2026
- LFGY Nov 5, 2026
- BITA Monthly
- LFGY Weekly
Distribution history
BITA vs LFGY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BITA LFGY 36.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BITA LFGY −0.20
- Worst fall
- BITA LFGY −35.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BITA 1.10LFGY 1.92
BITA and LFGY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


