BTCC ranks 2nd and LFGY 12th of 21 funds in the Crypto Option Income Category.
BTCC vs LFGY
BTCC −0.36pt a year
0.66%1.02%
LFGY 1.9×the volume
22.9K42.7K
BTCC vs LFGY Performance
−25.8%−23.2%
- BTCC 0.66%, better
- LFGY 1.02%
- BTCC $15M
- LFGY $59M
- BTCC −25.8%
- LFGY −23.2%, better
- BTCC 67.18%
- LFGY 81.23%, better
- BTCC 3
- LFGY 51
- BTCC 22.9K sh
- LFGY 42.7K sh, better
- BTCC $12.21
- LFGY $14.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTCC | LFGY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | C52Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | C53 | B55Higher |
Rank among Crypto Option Income funds
Same Category. BTCC and LFGY are both graded against the same 21 Crypto Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTCCA
LFGYC
In short
BTCC Grayscale's income angle on bitcoin: rather than just holding the asset, BTCC sells calls against bitcoin ETPs to convert crypto volatility into cash. Income first, bitcoin participation second, at a fee that undercuts most of its covered-call peers.
LFGY YieldMax made its name on single-stock option income. LFGY is the spread-out version: an actively managed basket of crypto-industry and tech stocks with options written against them, paying out monthly.
Stated mandate
BTCC The Fund seeks current income and, secondarily, participation in Bitcoin returns through options on Bitcoin exchange-traded products designed to track Bitcoin's price.
LFGY The actively managed fund seeks current income and capital appreciation through a portfolio of U.S.-listed equity securities issued by crypto-industry and technology companies, while using options on those securities and related ETFs to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTCC vs LFGY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTCC vs LFGY Cost
Overpaying LFGY vs BTCC
$6,116
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTCC 0.66%
$12,896
LFGY 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTCC | LFGY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $1,797 | $617 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $6,746 | $2,242 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $19,012 | $6,116 |
- 0.66%BTCC, cheaper
- 1.02%LFGY
- Middle half of Crypto Option Income funds
- Median 0.85%
BTCC 5th cheapest of 21 funds
LFGY 17th cheapest of 21 funds
BTCC vs LFGY Dividends
- BTCC 67.18%
- LFGY 81.23%, better
- BTCC $8.16
- LFGY $12.02
- BTCC $0.22
- LFGY $0.11
- BTCC Oct 29, 2026
- LFGY Nov 4, 2026
- BTCC Oct 30, 2026
- LFGY Nov 5, 2026
- BTCC Irregular
- LFGY Weekly
Distribution history
BTCC vs LFGY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTCC 29.0%LFGY 36.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTCC −0.65LFGY −0.20
- Worst fall
- BTCC −44.3%LFGY −35.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BTCC 1.00LFGY 1.92
BTCC and LFGY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

