BITA ranks 1st and XBCI 6th of 21 funds in the Crypto Option Income Category.
BITA vs XBCI
BITA −0.33pt a year
0.65%0.98%
XBCI 5.2×the volume
32.3K169K
BITA vs XBCI Performance
+18.0%+21.7%
- BITA 0.65%, better
- XBCI 0.98%
- BITA $96M
- XBCI $232M
- BITA 4
- XBCI 5
- BITA 32.3K sh
- XBCI 169K sh, better
- BITA $57.98
- XBCI $34.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BITA | XBCI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | D31 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A98Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | A80 |
| Holdings | C51 | |
| Durability | B61 | A72Higher |
Rank among Crypto Option Income funds
Same Category. BITA and XBCI are both graded against the same 21 Crypto Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BITAA
XBCIC
In short
BITA BlackRock's take on the bitcoin income trade: own actual bitcoin, then sell calls on only a quarter to a third of it. Most crypto covered-call funds hand over the upside to buy the yield. This one is built to leave most of it on the table.
XBCI Take NEOS's bitcoin covered-call playbook and turn the dial up. XBCI uses leverage to run roughly 150% of BTCI's strategies, boosting both the bitcoin exposure and the option premium behind a monthly payout. Amplified income, amplified swings.
Stated mandate
BITA The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of bitcoin while generating premium income through an actively managed strategy of selling call options primarily on IBIT shares and, from time to time, on ETP indices.
XBCI The Fund seeks boosted performance through high monthly income and potential appreciation from exposure to exchange-traded products that directly hold Bitcoin. It uses Bitcoin ETPs, synthetic options exposure, call-writing, and leverage, and does not invest directly in Bitcoin.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BITA vs XBCI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BITA vs XBCI Cost
Overpaying XBCI vs BITA
$5,645
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BITA 0.65%
$12,717
XBCI 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BITA | XBCI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,729 | $566 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $6,504 | $2,064 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $18,362 | $5,645 |
- 0.65%BITA, cheaper
- 0.98%XBCI
- Middle half of Crypto Option Income funds
- Median 0.85%
BITA cheapest of 21 funds
XBCI 14th cheapest of 21 funds
BITA vs XBCI Dividends
- BITA $0.73
- XBCI $1.35
- BITA Oct 2, 2026
- XBCI Oct 7, 2026
- BITA Oct 7, 2026
- XBCI Oct 9, 2026
- BITA Monthly
- XBCI Monthly
Distribution history
BITA vs XBCI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- BITA 1.10XBCI 1.14
BITA and XBCI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

