BTCC ranks 2nd and XBCI 6th of 21 funds in the Crypto Option Income Category.
BTCC vs XBCI
BTCC −0.32pt a year
0.66%0.98%
XBCI 7.1×the volume
23.9K169K
BTCC vs XBCI Performance
+5.7%+21.7%
- BTCC 0.66%, better
- XBCI 0.98%
- BTCC $15M
- XBCI $232M
- BTCC −27.4%
- XBCI
- BTCC 65.93%
- XBCI
- BTCC 4
- XBCI 5
- BTCC 23.9K sh
- XBCI 169K sh, better
- BTCC $12.40
- XBCI $34.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTCC | XBCI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | D31 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | C44 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | |
| Durability | C51 | A72Higher |
Rank among Crypto Option Income funds
Same Category. BTCC and XBCI are both graded against the same 21 Crypto Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTCCB
XBCIC
In short
BTCC Grayscale's income angle on bitcoin: rather than just holding the asset, BTCC sells calls against bitcoin ETPs to convert crypto volatility into cash. Income first, bitcoin participation second, at a fee that undercuts most of its covered-call peers.
XBCI Take NEOS's bitcoin covered-call playbook and turn the dial up. XBCI uses leverage to run roughly 150% of BTCI's strategies, boosting both the bitcoin exposure and the option premium behind a monthly payout. Amplified income, amplified swings.
Stated mandate
BTCC The Fund seeks current income and, secondarily, participation in Bitcoin returns through options on Bitcoin exchange-traded products designed to track Bitcoin's price.
XBCI The Fund seeks boosted performance through high monthly income and potential appreciation from exposure to exchange-traded products that directly hold Bitcoin. It uses Bitcoin ETPs, synthetic options exposure, call-writing, and leverage, and does not invest directly in Bitcoin.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTCC vs XBCI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTCC vs XBCI Cost
Overpaying XBCI vs BTCC
$5,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTCC 0.66%
$12,896
XBCI 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTCC | XBCI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $1,729 | $549 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $6,504 | $2,000 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $18,362 | $5,466 |
- 0.66%BTCC, cheaper
- 0.98%XBCI
- Middle half of Crypto Option Income funds
- Median 0.85%
BTCC 5th cheapest of 21 funds
XBCI 14th cheapest of 21 funds
BTCC vs XBCI Dividends
- BTCC 65.93%
- XBCI
- BTCC $8.16
- XBCI
- BTCC $0.22
- XBCI $1.35
- BTCC Oct 29, 2026
- XBCI Oct 7, 2026
- BTCC Oct 30, 2026
- XBCI Oct 9, 2026
- BTCC Irregular
- XBCI Monthly
Distribution history
BTCC vs XBCI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTCC 29.0%XBCI
- Return per unit of risk
- BTCC −0.65XBCI
- Worst fall
- BTCC −44.3%XBCI
- Market sensitivity
- BTCC 1.01XBCI 1.14
BTCC and XBCI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
