BITU ranks 1st and SLON 7th of 14 funds in the 2x Long Crypto Category.
BITU vs SLON
BITU −1.19pt a year
0.95%2.14%
BITU 42.1×the volume
4.37M104K
BITU vs SLON Performance
−65.6%−87.4%
- BITU 0.95%, better
- SLON 2.14%
- BITU $478M
- SLON $20M
- BITU −65.6%, better
- SLON −87.4%
- BITU 53.78%, better
- SLON 0.00%
- BITU 1
- SLON 1
- BITU 4.37M sh, better
- SLON 104K sh
- BITU $12.52
- SLON $25.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BITU | SLON |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | C45 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A78Higher | C49 |
Rank among 2x Long Crypto funds
Same Category. BITU and SLON are both graded against the same 14 2x Long Crypto funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BITUA
SLONC
In short
BITU ProShares' double-speed bitcoin trade. BITU targets 2x the daily move of the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index using swaps and futures, never the coin itself, for 0.95% inside an ordinary brokerage account.
SLON ProShares wrote the leveraged ETF playbook, then pointed it at Solana. SLON targets 2x the daily move of the Bloomberg Solana Index using swaps and futures, not coins: a daily-reset trading tool rather than a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
BITU BITU seeks daily investment results corresponding to two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index, before fees and expenses.
SLON The fund seeks daily returns equal to two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Solana Index, before fees and expenses. It uses futures and swaps rather than investing directly in Solana.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BITU vs SLON Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BITU vs SLON Cost
Overpaying SLON vs BITU
$16,730
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BITU 0.95%
$17,869
SLON 2.14%
$34,599
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BITU | SLON | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $3,598 | $1,920 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $12,863 | $6,541 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $34,599 | $16,730 |
- 0.95%BITU, cheaper
- 2.14%SLON
- Middle half of 2x Long Crypto funds
- Median 2.02%
BITU cheapest of 14 funds
SLON 8th cheapest of 14 funds
BITU vs SLON Dividends
- BITU 53.78%, better
- SLON 0.00%
- BITU $6.72
- SLON None
- BITU $0.01
- SLON
- BITU Nov 2, 2026
- SLON
- BITU Pays Nov 6, 2026
- SLON
- BITU Monthly
- SLON
Distribution history
BITU vs SLON Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BITU 94.2%SLON 125.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BITU 0.20SLON −0.71
- Worst fall
- BITU −83.4%SLON −96.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BITU 3.42SLON 1.68
BITU and SLON in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.14% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.14% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 2.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.14% · 2.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



