Skip to content

BKDV vs CSTK

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF

BKDVBNYSE Arca

Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF

CSTKBCboe

Overlap

24.7%by weight

Expense ratio

CSTK −0.25pt a year

BKDV0.60%CSTK0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

BKDV 54.5×the volume

BKDV491KCSTK9.02K

BKDV vs CSTK Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+24.8%BKDV+21.7%CSTK

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BKDV +24.8%. CSTK +21.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BKDV 0.60%
CSTK 0.35%, better
Fund size
BKDV $2.29B
CSTK $184M
1Y total return
BKDV +24.8%, better
CSTK +21.7%
Yield (12M)
BKDV 0.52%
CSTK 1.79%, better
Holdings
BKDV 78
CSTK 61
Avg volume (30D)
BKDV 491K sh, better
CSTK 9.02K sh
NAV per share
BKDV $34.69
CSTK $33.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BKDV: Cost 44, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 74, Holdings 57, Durability 75. CSTK: Cost 70, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 72, Durability 50.
Pillar letters and Scores for BKDV, CSTK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBKDVCSTK
Cost30% weightC44A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB67B67
Tradability15% weightA74HigherC54
Holdings10% weightB57A72Higher
Durability5% weightA75HigherC50

Rank among US Active Contrarian Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BKDV and CSTK are both graded against the same 8 US Active Contrarian Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 8 ›

CSTK ranks 3rd and BKDV 4th of 8 funds in the US Active Contrarian Value Category.

  1. Rank 1ADFALDimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATVALT. Rowe Price Value ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3BCSTKInvesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 4BBKDVBNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 5CVSLUApplied Finance Valuation Large Cap ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BKDVBBNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF

CSTKBInvesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF

In short

BKDV BNY Mellon's 2024 swing at active value: roughly 90 hand-picked US stocks, priced below what the typical active equity fund charges. A young fund with a very old asset manager behind it.

CSTK No data

Stated mandate

BKDV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and invests principally in common stocks.

CSTK No data

Why people hold it

  • BKDV At 0.60% a year, it undercuts the 0.65% median for active US equity funds. Not index-cheap, but you aren't paying a premium for the stock picking.
  • Roughly 90 holdings, so every name has to earn its slot. This is a concentrated value book chasing long-term capital appreciation, not a closet index wearing a value label.
  • Sits in the top quartile of its active US equity peer group, helped by downside behavior that has been steadier than most rivals over its short life.
  • Already a billion-dollar-plus fund despite launching in 2024, backed by one of the oldest names in US asset management.

CSTK No data

Worth knowing

  • BKDV Launched November 2024. The risk picture rests on about a year of live data, and short records tell you less than long ones.
  • Systematic peers cost a fraction of this: DFAU charges 0.12%, AVLC 0.15%. The active premium here is several times their fee.
  • Moderately traded rather than one of the busiest tickers in the category, so spreads can run wider than on big index products.

CSTK No data

Full BKDV profile⁠

Full CSTK profile⁠

BKDV vs CSTK Holdings

How BKDV and CSTK differ

Overlap by weight

24.7%

Shared holdings make up 34.4% of BKDV and 33.5% of CSTK.

Level by level

  • Holdings19 in both24.7%
  • Sector11 Sectors89.3%
  • Countryby domicile97.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in BKDV and CSTK, widest gap first
SectorMore in BKDVMore in CSTK
Consumer DiscretionaryBKDV +3.5 points
CommunicationCSTK +2.7 points
TechnologyBKDV +2.5 points
MaterialsBKDV +2.5 points
UtilitiesCSTK +2.2 points
IndustrialsCSTK +2.1 points
EnergyCSTK +1.5 points
Health CareCSTK +1.3 points
Consumer StaplesBKDV +1.3 points
Real EstateBKDV +1.0 points
FinancialsCSTK +0.9 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BKDV and CSTK, widest gap first
CountryMore in BKDVMore in CSTK
United StatesBKDV +2.0 points
United KingdomCSTK +1.6 points
GermanyCSTK +1.0 points
SwitzerlandBKDV +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BKDV34.8%
  • CSTK28.3%

Securities held

  • BKDV78
  • CSTK60

Asset class

BKDV
Equity
CSTK
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BKDV59
  • In both19
  • Only in CSTK41

Only in BKDV

59 securities, 65.7% of BKDV by weight

  • Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Money M3.99%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc-Cl B3.66%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co3.54%

Only in CSTK

41 securities, 66.5% of CSTK by weight

  • Alphabet Inc3.17%
  • Chevron Corp3.13%
  • Wells Fargo & Co2.94%

Weight gaps

All 19 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BKDV and CSTK, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BKDVMore in CSTK
Amazon.com IncAMZNBKDV +3.62 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTBKDV +2.41 points
Coca-Cola Co/TheKOBKDV +1.86 points
Cisco Systems IncCSCOCSTK +1.29 points
Merck & Co. Inc.MRKCSTK +1.21 points
Meta Platforms Inc-Class AMETACSTK +1.11 points
Johnson & JohnsonJNJBKDV +1.02 points
Philip Morris InternationalPMCSTK +0.99 points

All 79 BKDV holdings⁠All 60 CSTK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BKDV vs CSTK Cost

Overpaying BKDV vs CSTK

$4,691

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BKDV 0.60%

    $11,817

  • CSTK 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BKDV 0.60%
  • CSTK 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530BKDV $11,817CSTK $7,126

Year by year

YearBKDVCSTKOverpaying
10$1,076$634$442
20$4,116$2,454$1,662
30$11,817$7,126$4,691

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%BKDV
  • 0.35%CSTK, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Contrarian Value funds
  • Median 0.54%

CSTK 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

BKDV 5th cheapest of 8 funds

BKDV vs CSTK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BKDV 0.52%
CSTK 1.79%, better
Payout (12M)
BKDV $0.18
CSTK $0.60
Last payment
BKDV $0.18
CSTK $0.12
Ex-dividend
BKDV Dec 29, 2025
CSTK Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
BKDV Jan 2, 2026
CSTK Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
BKDV Annual
CSTK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

BKDVAnnual · 2 paymentsAll BKDV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2024 $0.07; Dec 29, 2025 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
CSTKQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll CSTK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Sep 22, 2025 $0.23; Dec 22, 2025 $0.19; Mar 23, 2026 $0.15; Jun 22, 2026 $0.14; Sep 21, 2026 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

BKDV vs CSTK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BKDV 11.9%since Dec 2024CSTK 10.7%since Jun 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BKDV 0.94since Dec 2024CSTK 1.59since Jun 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BKDV −15.5%since Nov 2024CSTK −8.9%since May 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BKDV 0.73CSTK 0.73Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • BKDVBvsDFALA

    BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSTKBvsDFALA

    Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BKDVBvsTVALA

    BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF · T. Rowe Price Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSTKBvsTVALA

    Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF · T. Rowe Price Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BKDVBvsVSLUC

    BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF · Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSTKBvsVSLUC

    Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF · Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.