BKDV ranks 4th and VSLU 5th of 8 funds in the US Active Contrarian Value Category.
BKDV vs VSLU
VSLU −0.11pt a year
0.60%0.49%
BKDV 18.4×the volume
491K26.7K
BKDV vs VSLU Performance
+24.8%+12.5%
- BKDV 0.60%
- VSLU 0.49%, better
- BKDV $2.29B
- VSLU $578M
- BKDV +24.8%, better
- VSLU +12.5%
- BKDV 0.52%, better
- VSLU 0.42%
- BKDV 78
- VSLU 442
- BKDV 491K sh, better
- VSLU 26.7K sh
- BKDV $34.69
- VSLU $49.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKDV | VSLU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C44 | B57Higher |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | B57Higher | D39 |
| Durability | A75Higher | B56 |
Rank among US Active Contrarian Value funds
Same Category. BKDV and VSLU are both graded against the same 8 US Active Contrarian Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKDVB
VSLUC
In short
BKDV BNY Mellon's 2024 swing at active value: roughly 90 hand-picked US stocks, priced below what the typical active equity fund charges. A young fund with a very old asset manager behind it.
VSLU Applied Finance has been estimating what companies are actually worth since 1995. VSLU runs that engine on US large caps: own the ones trading below its intrinsic-value estimate, for less than the typical active fund charges.
Stated mandate
BKDV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and invests principally in common stocks.
VSLU The Fund’s stated objective is long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKDV vs VSLU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKDV vs VSLU Cost
Overpaying BKDV vs VSLU
$2,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKDV 0.60%
$11,817
VSLU 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKDV | VSLU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $883 | $193 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $3,394 | $722 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $9,792 | $2,025 |
- 0.60%BKDV
- 0.49%VSLU, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Contrarian Value funds
- Median 0.54%
VSLU 4th cheapest of 8 funds
BKDV 5th cheapest of 8 funds
BKDV vs VSLU Dividends
- BKDV 0.52%, better
- VSLU 0.42%
- BKDV $0.18
- VSLU $0.20
- BKDV $0.18
- VSLU $0.20
- BKDV Dec 29, 2025
- VSLU Dec 24, 2025
- BKDV Jan 2, 2026
- VSLU Dec 26, 2025
- BKDV Annual
- VSLU Annual
Distribution history
BKDV vs VSLU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKDV 11.9%VSLU 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKDV 0.94VSLU 1.53
- Worst fall
- BKDV −15.5%VSLU −23.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BKDV 0.73VSLU 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.