SCHZ ranks 2nd and BLV 22nd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
BLV vs SCHZ
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.03%0.03%
SCHZ 3.0×the volume
780K2.37M
SCHZ +0.7pt
+0.5%+1.2%
BLV vs SCHZ Performance
−21.7%−1.0%
- BLV 0.03%
- SCHZ 0.03%
- BLV $7.8B
- SCHZ $10.8B
- BLV −3.8%
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- BLV 5.05%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- BLV 2905
- SCHZ 12610
- BLV 780K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- BLV $65.24
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BLV | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97 | A97 |
| Mission | A85 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F23 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B67 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A91Higher | A88 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. BLV and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BLVA
SCHZA
In short
BLV Most bond ETFs spread across every maturity. BLV camps at the long end, tracking an index of long-dated Treasuries and investment-grade corporates for 0.03% a year. Maximum interest-rate sensitivity, minimum price tag.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
BLV The fund seeks to track a market-weighted index of long-term, dollar-denominated bonds through an indexing approach. It invests at least 80% of assets in securities represented by the target index and uses sampling.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BLV vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BLV vs SCHZ Cost
Same expense ratio
$638
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BLV 0.03%
$638
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BLV | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $55 |
| 20 | $216 | $216 |
| 30 | $638 | $638 |
- 0.03%BLV
- 0.03%SCHZ
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
BLV 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
BLV vs SCHZ Dividends
- BLV 5.05%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- BLV $3.29
- SCHZ $0.96
- BLV $0.27
- SCHZ $0.08
- BLV Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- BLV Oct 5, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- BLV Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
BLV vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BLV
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BLV 11.8%SCHZ 5.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BLV 0.15SCHZ 0.17, better
- Worst fall
- BLV −36.3%SCHZ −17.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BLV 1.94SCHZ 0.99
BLV and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
