Skip to content

BMAR vs SIXJ

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BMARCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.05pt a year

BMAR0.79%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BMAR 1.05×the volume

BMAR15.9KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

BMAR +2.5pt

BMAR+17.1%SIXJ+14.6%

BMAR vs SIXJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+12.7%BMAR+10.2%SIXJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. BMAR +12.7%. SIXJ +10.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%7.5%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BMAR 0.79%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
BMAR $201M
SIXJ $148M
1Y total return
BMAR +12.7%, better
SIXJ +10.2%
Holdings
BMAR 3
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
BMAR 15.9K sh, better
SIXJ 15.1K sh
NAV per share
BMAR $58.97
SIXJ $37.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BMAR: Cost 40, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings not scored, Durability 68. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for BMAR, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBMARSIXJ
Cost30% weightC40B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB63B68Higher
Tradability15% weightB61A70Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC53
Durability5% weightB68HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BMAR and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 4th and BMAR 33rd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BBUFMAB Moderate Buffer ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 33CBAPRInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 33CBMARInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 52
  8. Rank 33CNVBTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BMARCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

BMAR The March vintage of Innovator's buffer lineup: it tracks SPY up to a cap set each March 1, and absorbs the first 9% of losses over the 12 months that follow. Running since 2020.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

BMAR The fund seeks to track SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the outcome period.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • BMAR The 9% cushion is written into the fund's terms, not left to a manager's judgment, and it resets with a fresh cap every March 1.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79%, the fee sits right at the median for its shallow-buffer peer group. The March calendar slot costs no premium.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, so the exposure underneath is plain US large-cap, with no bespoke index to decode.innovatoretfs.com
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • BMAR Protection runs 9% deep and no further. Losses past that come through in full, and gains stop at the cap.
  • Terms are set for the full outcome period. Enter mid-period and your real cushion and remaining upside differ from the headline numbers.innovatoretfs.com
  • Laddered rivals cost less: BUFB spreads buffer exposure across vintages for 0.10%, a fraction of BMAR's 0.79%.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full BMAR profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

BMAR vs SIXJ Holdings

How BMAR and SIXJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BMAR and 0.0% of SIXJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in BMAR and SIXJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in BMARMore in SIXJ
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BMAR and SIXJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in BMARMore in SIXJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BMAR102.0%
  • SIXJ100.8%

Securities held

  • BMAR3
  • SIXJ2

Asset class

BMAR
Equity
SIXJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BMAR3
  • In both0
  • Only in SIXJ2

Only in BMAR

3 securities, 100% of BMAR by weight

  • Spy 02/26/2027 6.87 C100.45%
  • Spy 02/26/2027 686 P1.29%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.28%

Only in SIXJ

2 securities, 100% of SIXJ by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 5.53 C98.55%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 746.70 P1.96%

Weight gaps

BMAR and SIXJ share no securities.

All 6 BMAR holdings⁠All 5 SIXJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BMAR vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying BMAR vs SIXJ

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BMAR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BMAR 0.79%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BMAR $15,174SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearBMARSIXJOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BMAR
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

BMAR 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BMAR vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BMAR None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

BMARAll BMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BMAR vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BMAR 8.0%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BMAR 1.58SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BMAR −15.0%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BMAR 0.63SIXJ 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • BMARCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMARCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMARCvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.