SIXJ ranks 4th and BMAR 33rd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
BMAR vs SIXJ
0.0%by weight
SIXJ −0.05pt a year
0.79%0.74%
BMAR 1.05×the volume
15.9K15.1K
BMAR +2.5pt
+17.1%+14.6%
BMAR vs SIXJ Performance
+12.7%+10.2%
- BMAR 0.79%
- SIXJ 0.74%, better
- BMAR $201M
- SIXJ $148M
- BMAR +12.7%, better
- SIXJ +10.2%
- BMAR 3
- SIXJ 3
- BMAR 15.9K sh, better
- SIXJ 15.1K sh
- BMAR $58.97
- SIXJ $37.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BMAR | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | B68Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | B68Higher | B57 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. BMAR and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BMARC
SIXJB
In short
BMAR The March vintage of Innovator's buffer lineup: it tracks SPY up to a cap set each March 1, and absorbs the first 9% of losses over the 12 months that follow. Running since 2020.
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
Stated mandate
BMAR The fund seeks to track SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the outcome period.
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BMAR vs SIXJ Holdings
How BMAR and SIXJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BMAR and 0.0% of SIXJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in BMARMore in SIXJ | BMAR | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BMARMore in SIXJ | BMAR | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BMAR102.0%
- SIXJ100.8%
- BMAR3
- SIXJ2
Asset class
- BMAR
- Equity
- SIXJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BMAR3
- In both0
- Only in SIXJ2
Only in BMAR
3 securities, 100% of BMAR by weight
- Spy 02/26/2027 6.87 C100.45%
- Spy 02/26/2027 686 P1.29%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.28%
Only in SIXJ
2 securities, 100% of SIXJ by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 5.53 C98.55%
- Spy 12/31/2026 746.70 P1.96%
Weight gaps
BMAR and SIXJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BMAR vs SIXJ Cost
Overpaying BMAR vs SIXJ
$867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BMAR 0.79%
$15,174
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BMAR | SIXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,319 | $86 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,015 | $316 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $14,307 | $867 |
- 0.79%BMAR
- 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
BMAR 34th cheapest of 77 funds
BMAR vs SIXJ Dividends
- BMAR None
- SIXJ None
Distribution history
BMAR vs SIXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BMAR 8.0%SIXJ 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BMAR 1.58SIXJ 1.67, better
- Worst fall
- BMAR −15.0%SIXJ −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BMAR 0.63SIXJ 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.