UNHG ranks 2nd and BMNG 71st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BMNG vs UNHG
6.7%by weight
UNHG −0.01pt a year
0.78%0.77%
UNHG 1.1×the volume
680K726K
BMNG vs UNHG Performance
−94.3%+8.4%
- BMNG 0.78%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- BMNG $31M
- UNHG $63M
- BMNG −94.3%
- UNHG +8.4%, better
- BMNG 6
- UNHG 5
- BMNG 680K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- BMNG $15.45
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BMNG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | B60 |
| Mission | A86 | A90Higher |
| Risk | F23 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A75 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BMNG and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BMNGC
UNHGA
In short
BMNG BitMine's balance sheet is mostly Ethereum. BMNG aims to deliver 200% of that stock's daily move, so you are stacking leverage on something that already trades like a crypto proxy. Fee: 0.78%, no waiver.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
BMNG The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of BitMine stock, identified as BMNR.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BMNG vs UNHG Holdings
How BMNG and UNHG differ
6.7%
Shared holdings make up 13.5% of UNHG and 6.7% of BMNG.
Level by level
- Holdings6.7%
Sector
No Sector split for BMNG and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BMNGMore in UNHG | BMNG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- BMNG207.0%
- UNHG213.5%
- BMNG1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- BMNG
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BMNG0
- In both1
- Only in UNHG0
Only in BMNG
0 securities, 0.0% of BMNG by weight
Only in UNHG
0 securities, 0.0% of UNHG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in BMNGMore in UNHG | BMNG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | UNHG +6.74 points | 6.73% | 13.47% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BMNG vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying BMNG vs UNHG
$173
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BMNG 0.78%
$15,002
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BMNG | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,371 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $5,205 | $63 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $14,829 | $173 |
- 0.78%BMNG
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
BMNG 142nd cheapest of 315 funds
BMNG vs UNHG Dividends
- BMNG None
- UNHG
- BMNG
- UNHG $1.90
- BMNG
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- BMNG
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- BMNG
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
BMNG vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BMNG 168.0%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BMNG −0.80UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BMNG −97.3%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BMNG 1.83UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.