PANG ranks 3rd and BMNG 71st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BMNG vs PANG
PANG −0.02pt a year
0.78%0.76%
BMNG 15.2×the volume
680K44.6K
BMNG vs PANG Performance
−94.3%+76.3%
- BMNG 0.78%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- BMNG $31M
- PANG $9M
- BMNG −94.3%
- PANG +76.3%, better
- BMNG 6
- PANG 4
- BMNG 680K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- BMNG $15.45
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BMNG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A86 | A94Higher |
| Risk | F23 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BMNG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BMNGC
PANGA
In short
BMNG BitMine's balance sheet is mostly Ethereum. BMNG aims to deliver 200% of that stock's daily move, so you are stacking leverage on something that already trades like a crypto proxy. Fee: 0.78%, no waiver.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
BMNG The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of BitMine stock, identified as BMNR.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BMNG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BMNG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying BMNG vs PANG
$346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BMNG 0.78%
$15,002
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BMNG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,353 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $5,142 | $126 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $14,656 | $346 |
- 0.78%BMNG
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
BMNG 142nd cheapest of 315 funds
BMNG vs PANG Dividends
- BMNG None
- PANG
- BMNG
- PANG $1.30
- BMNG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- BMNG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- BMNG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
BMNG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BMNG 168.0%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BMNG −0.80PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BMNG −97.3%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BMNG 1.83PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.