UNHG ranks 2nd and BMNU 275th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BMNU vs UNHG
0.0%by weight
UNHG −0.73pt a year
1.50%0.77%
BMNU 6.7×the volume
4.88M726K
BMNU vs UNHG Performance
−94.1%+11.9%
- BMNU 1.50%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- BMNU $278M
- UNHG $63M
- BMNU −94.1%
- UNHG +11.9%, better
- BMNU 7
- UNHG 5
- BMNU 4.88M sh, better
- UNHG 726K sh
- BMNU $13.22
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BMNU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A90 | |
| Risk | F24 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BMNU and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BMNUD
UNHGA
In short
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BMNU vs UNHG Holdings
How BMNU and UNHG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BMNU and 0.0% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BMNU and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BMNUMore in UNHG | BMNU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- BMNU209.8%
- UNHG212.0%
- BMNU1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- BMNU
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BMNU1
- In both0
- Only in UNHG1
Only in BMNU
1 security, 9.5% of BMNU by weight
- First American Government Obli First Am Gov Oblig X9.49%
Only in UNHG
1 security, 12.0% of UNHG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204011.99%
Weight gaps
BMNU and UNHG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BMNU vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying BMNU vs UNHG
$11,454
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BMNU 1.50%
$26,283
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BMNU | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,371 | $1,219 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,205 | $4,314 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,829 | $11,454 |
- 1.50%BMNU
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
BMNU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
BMNU vs UNHG Dividends
- BMNU None
- UNHG
- BMNU
- UNHG $1.90
- BMNU
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- BMNU
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- BMNU
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
BMNU vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BMNU 161.4%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BMNU −0.96UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BMNU −98.3%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BMNU 2.52UNHG 5.53
BMNU and UNHG in the news
First-Year Review
Since year-end the 2x BitMine fund lost half while the stock rose

Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.