PANG ranks 3rd and BMNU 275th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BMNU vs PANG
PANG −0.74pt a year
1.50%0.76%
BMNU 109.3×the volume
4.88M44.6K
BMNU vs PANG Performance
−94.1%+91.6%
- BMNU 1.50%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- BMNU $278M
- PANG $9M
- BMNU −94.1%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- BMNU 7
- PANG 4
- BMNU 4.88M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- BMNU $13.22
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BMNU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | F24 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BMNU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BMNUD
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BMNU vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BMNU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying BMNU vs PANG
$11,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BMNU 1.50%
$26,283
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BMNU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,353 | $1,237 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,142 | $4,377 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,656 | $11,627 |
- 1.50%BMNU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
BMNU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
BMNU vs PANG Dividends
- BMNU None
- PANG
- BMNU
- PANG $1.30
- BMNU
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- BMNU
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- BMNU
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
BMNU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BMNU 161.4%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BMNU −0.96PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BMNU −98.3%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BMNU 2.52PANG 3.32
BMNU and PANG in the news
First-Year Review
Since year-end the 2x BitMine fund lost half while the stock rose

Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.