VCRM ranks 4th and BMOP 45th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
BMOP vs VCRM
VCRM −0.37pt a year
0.49%0.12%
VCRM 2.7×the volume
247K679K
BMOP vs VCRM Performance
−1.4%−0.4%
- BMOP 0.49%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- BMOP $1.52B
- VCRM $2.2B
- BMOP
- VCRM +1.1%
- BMOP
- VCRM 3.81%
- BMOP 622
- VCRM 2588
- BMOP 247K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- BMOP $24.12
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BMOP | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A88 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A80 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. BMOP and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BMOPC
VCRMA
In short
BMOP A 2008-vintage muni strategy that reached the ETF market the long way: it ran for years as a BNY Mellon mutual fund before reorganizing into this ETF in January 2026. Still actively managed, still hunting mispriced bonds across the muni market.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
BMOP The ETF seeks total return through high current income exempt from federal income tax and capital appreciation.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BMOP vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BMOP vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying BMOP vs VCRM
$7,272
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BMOP 0.49%
$9,792
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BMOP | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $220 | $663 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $859 | $2,535 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $2,520 | $7,272 |
- 0.49%BMOP
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
BMOP 56th cheapest of 63 funds
BMOP vs VCRM Dividends
- BMOP
- VCRM 3.81%
- BMOP
- VCRM $2.82
- BMOP $0.08
- VCRM $0.21
- BMOP Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- BMOP Oct 6, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- BMOP Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
BMOP vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BMOP VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BMOP VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- BMOP VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BMOP 1.03VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.