MUB ranks 2nd and VCRM 4th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MUB vs VCRM
MUB −0.07pt a year
0.05%0.12%
MUB 13.7×the volume
9.29M679K
MUB vs VCRM Performance
+0.1%+1.1%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- VCRM 0.12%
- MUB $54.4B
- VCRM $2.2B
- MUB +0.1%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- MUB 3.28%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- MUB 7950
- VCRM 2588
- MUB 9.29M sh, better
- VCRM 679K sh
- MUB $103.96
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUB | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | A89 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B65 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B69 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A81 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A74 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MUB and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUBA
VCRMA
In short
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUB vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUB vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying VCRM vs MUB
$1,460
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUB | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $220 | $128 |
| 20 | $360 | $859 | $499 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $2,520 | $1,460 |
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- 0.12%VCRM
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
MUB vs VCRM Dividends
- MUB 3.28%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- MUB $3.42
- VCRM $2.82
- MUB $0.28
- VCRM $0.21
- MUB Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- MUB Oct 6, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- MUB Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
MUB vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUB 5.7%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUB −0.03VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- MUB −11.6%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- MUB 0.90VCRM 0.17
MUB and VCRM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





