BNDW ranks 2nd and FISR 23rd of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BNDW vs FISR
BNDW −0.45pt a year
0.05%0.50%
FISR 1.9×the volume
117K219K
BNDW +1.4pt
+0.1%−1.3%
BNDW vs FISR Performance
0.0%−0.7%
- BNDW 0.05%, better
- FISR 0.50%
- BNDW $1.9B
- FISR $645M
- BNDW −0.2%
- FISR −0.2%
- BNDW 4.68%, better
- FISR 4.37%
- BNDW 4
- FISR 12
- BNDW 117K sh
- FISR 219K sh, better
- BNDW $66.90
- FISR $24.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNDW | FISR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D39 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C43Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | B66 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | F20 | F23Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | B63 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BNDW and FISR are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNDWA
FISRC
In short
BNDW One ticker for the whole investment-grade bond market, home and abroad. Vanguard built BNDW as a wrapper around its own US and international bond funds and prices the package at 0.05% a year.
FISR Most bond funds pick a lane and stay there. FISR is actively steered: a SPDR fund that rotates across fixed income sectors, using both ETFs and individual bonds, in pursuit of risk-adjusted return with current income.
Stated mandate
BNDW The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index and provide broad exposure to the global investment-grade bond market through an ETF-of-ETFs structure.
FISR FISR is an actively managed fixed-income fund that allocates among multiple fixed-income sectors, using ETFs and individual securities. It seeks to maximize risk-adjusted return while providing current income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNDW vs FISR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNDW vs FISR Cost
Overpaying FISR vs BNDW
$8,919
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNDW 0.05%
$1,060
FISR 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNDW | FISR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $900 | $808 |
| 20 | $360 | $3,460 | $3,100 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $9,979 | $8,919 |
- 0.05%BNDW, cheaper
- 0.50%FISR
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
BNDW cheapest of 28 funds
FISR 18th cheapest of 28 funds
BNDW vs FISR Dividends
- BNDW 4.68%, better
- FISR 4.37%
- BNDW $3.12
- FISR $1.09
- BNDW $0.21
- FISR $0.09
- BNDW Nov 2, 2026
- FISR Nov 2, 2026
- BNDW Pays Nov 4, 2026
- FISR Nov 5, 2026
- BNDW Monthly
- FISR Monthly
Distribution history
BNDW vs FISR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNDW 4.7%, betterFISR 5.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BNDW 0.10, betterFISR 0.09
- Worst fall
- BNDW −16.2%, betterFISR −19.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BNDW 0.82FISR 1.02
BNDW and FISR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
