BNDW ranks 2nd and FLXR 10th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BNDW vs FLXR
BNDW −0.35pt a year
0.05%0.40%
FLXR 5.3×the volume
117K620K
BNDW vs FLXR Performance
−0.4%+1.9%
- BNDW 0.05%, better
- FLXR 0.40%
- BNDW $1.9B
- FLXR $3.85B
- BNDW −0.4%
- FLXR +1.9%, better
- BNDW 4.36%
- FLXR 6.28%, better
- BNDW 4
- FLXR 1515
- BNDW 117K sh
- FLXR 620K sh, better
- BNDW $66.90
- FLXR $38.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNDW | FLXR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C54 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A82 |
| Risk | C43 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | F20 | A70Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A72 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BNDW and FLXR are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNDWA
FLXRB
In short
BNDW One ticker for the whole investment-grade bond market, home and abroad. Vanguard built BNDW as a wrapper around its own US and international bond funds and prices the package at 0.05% a year.
FLXR A go-anywhere bond fund from a fixed-income house. TCW measures FLXR against the Agg but doesn't copy it, roaming global credit, currencies and rates in search of income. Running since 2018, and it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
BNDW The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index and provide broad exposure to the global investment-grade bond market through an ETF-of-ETFs structure.
FLXR The fund seeks a high level of current income and, secondarily, long-term capital appreciation. It uses an actively managed flexible approach across global opportunities tied to credit, currencies, and interest rates.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNDW vs FLXR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNDW vs FLXR Cost
Overpaying FLXR vs BNDW
$7,030
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNDW 0.05%
$1,060
FLXR 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNDW | FLXR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $723 | $631 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,793 | $2,433 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $8,090 | $7,030 |
- 0.05%BNDW, cheaper
- 0.40%FLXR
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
BNDW cheapest of 28 funds
FLXR 14th cheapest of 28 funds
BNDW vs FLXR Dividends
- BNDW 4.36%
- FLXR 6.28%, better
- BNDW $2.92
- FLXR $2.40
- BNDW $0.20
- FLXR $0.20
- BNDW Oct 1, 2026
- FLXR Oct 1, 2026
- BNDW Oct 5, 2026
- FLXR Oct 5, 2026
- BNDW Monthly
- FLXR Monthly
Distribution history
BNDW vs FLXR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNDW 4.7%FLXR 3.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BNDW 0.10FLXR 0.56
- Worst fall
- BNDW −16.2%FLXR −2.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BNDW 0.82FLXR 0.71
BNDW and FLXR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
