BNDW ranks 2nd and FTBD 21st of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BNDW vs FTBD
BNDW −0.50pt a year
0.05%0.55%
BNDW 30.6×the volume
117K3.83K
FTBD +1.4pt
+4.9%+6.3%
BNDW vs FTBD Performance
−0.4%−0.2%
- BNDW 0.05%, better
- FTBD 0.55%
- BNDW $1.9B
- FTBD $37M
- BNDW −0.4%
- FTBD −0.2%, better
- BNDW 4.36%
- FTBD 5.14%, better
- BNDW 4
- FTBD 748
- BNDW 117K sh, better
- FTBD 3.83K sh
- BNDW $66.90
- FTBD $47.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNDW | FTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A97 |
| Risk | C43 | C44Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | F20 | F22Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | C44 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BNDW and FTBD are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNDWA
FTBDC
In short
BNDW One ticker for the whole investment-grade bond market, home and abroad. Vanguard built BNDW as a wrapper around its own US and international bond funds and prices the package at 0.05% a year.
FTBD Fidelity's go-anywhere bond sleeve: measured against the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate, but the managers can roam into foreign and emerging-market debt and shift along the yield curve. Active bets, index yardstick, monthly income.
Stated mandate
BNDW The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index and provide broad exposure to the global investment-grade bond market through an ETF-of-ETFs structure.
FTBD The fund seeks a high level of current income and may also pursue capital growth. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in debt securities and repurchase agreements across the debt market, using active asset allocation, sector and security selection, yield-curve positioning, and opportunistic trading.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNDW vs FTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNDW vs FTBD Cost
Overpaying FTBD vs BNDW
$9,844
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNDW 0.05%
$1,060
FTBD 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNDW | FTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $988 | $896 |
| 20 | $360 | $3,790 | $3,430 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $10,904 | $9,844 |
- 0.05%BNDW, cheaper
- 0.55%FTBD
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
BNDW cheapest of 28 funds
FTBD 22nd cheapest of 28 funds
BNDW vs FTBD Dividends
- BNDW 4.36%
- FTBD 5.14%, better
- BNDW $2.92
- FTBD $2.44
- BNDW $0.20
- FTBD $0.20
- BNDW Oct 1, 2026
- FTBD Oct 29, 2026
- BNDW Oct 5, 2026
- FTBD Pays Nov 2, 2026
- BNDW Monthly
- FTBD Monthly
Distribution history
BNDW vs FTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNDW 4.7%, betterFTBD 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BNDW 0.10FTBD 0.31, better
- Worst fall
- BNDW −16.2%FTBD −7.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BNDW 0.82FTBD 1.04
BNDW and FTBD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
