BNDW ranks 2nd and SCMC 20th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BNDW vs SCMC
BNDW −0.50pt a year
0.05%0.55%
BNDW 2.4×the volume
117K48.9K
BNDW vs SCMC Performance
−0.2%+1.7%
- BNDW 0.05%, better
- SCMC 0.55%
- BNDW $1.9B
- SCMC $261M
- BNDW −0.4%
- SCMC
- BNDW 4.36%
- SCMC
- BNDW 4
- SCMC 200
- BNDW 117K sh, better
- SCMC 48.9K sh
- BNDW $66.90
- SCMC $24.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNDW | SCMC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B69 |
| Risk | C43 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | F20 | A88Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | D32 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BNDW and SCMC are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNDWA
SCMCC
In short
BNDW One ticker for the whole investment-grade bond market, home and abroad. Vanguard built BNDW as a wrapper around its own US and international bond funds and prices the package at 0.05% a year.
SCMC A go-anywhere bond fund in a category built on index clones. Sterling Capital's managers roam US and overseas debt hunting total return and current income, rather than owning whatever the aggregate index says to own. It opened in December 2025.
Stated mandate
BNDW The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index and provide broad exposure to the global investment-grade bond market through an ETF-of-ETFs structure.
SCMC The actively managed ETF seeks competitive total return and current income. It uses a flexible, unconstrained approach across U.S. and non-U.S. markets, normally investing at least 80% of its assets in bonds and other debt obligations.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNDW vs SCMC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNDW vs SCMC Cost
Overpaying SCMC vs BNDW
$9,844
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNDW 0.05%
$1,060
SCMC 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNDW | SCMC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $988 | $896 |
| 20 | $360 | $3,790 | $3,430 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $10,904 | $9,844 |
- 0.05%BNDW, cheaper
- 0.55%SCMC
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
BNDW cheapest of 28 funds
SCMC 22nd cheapest of 28 funds
BNDW vs SCMC Dividends
- BNDW 4.36%
- SCMC
- BNDW $2.92
- SCMC
- BNDW $0.20
- SCMC $0.12
- BNDW Oct 1, 2026
- SCMC Oct 1, 2026
- BNDW Oct 5, 2026
- SCMC Oct 5, 2026
- BNDW Monthly
- SCMC Monthly
Distribution history
BNDW vs SCMC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNDW 4.7%SCMC
- Return per unit of risk
- BNDW 0.10SCMC
- Worst fall
- BNDW −16.2%SCMC
- Market sensitivity
- BNDW 0.82SCMC 0.09
BNDW and SCMC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
